1878131 - (interop-2024-indexeddb) [meta] Interop 2024 IndexedDB

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Core :: Storage: IndexedDB, task)

Description

[Thomas Wisniewski [:twisniewski]]

Tracking bug for indexedDB focus area in Interop-2024.

Test results

Comment 1

[Jens Stutte [:jstutte]]

I suspect that some more of the referenced bugs could better be of enhancement type here? There are pieces of the spec we know we do not support, yet, IIUC. Jari, would you mind taking a look?

Comment 2

[Jari Jalkanen [:jari]]

The following list tries to answer whether the issue may be classified as enhancement:

• 1275496 - YES/NO: custom API deprecation: could be an enhancement too but has a defect as a side effect
• 1814534 - NO: fails sometimes in all browsers, needs debugging
• 1878134 - YES: we didn't really have support for deferred key assignments
• 1878137 - NO/YES: small architecture change: the old way leads to a defect mostly in this special case
• 1878148 - NO: fails at onupgradeneeded, test expects instant exception
• 1878149 - NO and YES: there used to be a defect which caused this test to hang at the end (a bug, might still be relevant, root cause should be removed by nsThreadPool or D206588, we used to add idle timers when closing threads with the IDB custom thread pool, this test case has > 100 instances and it caused a shutdown hang), otherwise it fails because filelist and symbol cloning is incomplete (enhancement)
• 1878720 - NO: most likely the same underlying issue as 1814534, see above
• 1878722 - NO: currently this test seems to be passing
• 1799374 - NO (not really): fixed already, required a small enhancement of requests
• 1878132 - YES: solved by enhancement 934640
• 1878143 - YES: we did not support durability
• 1878146 - NO: test was incorrect

Comment 3

[Takanori MATSUURA]

All bugs that depended on this have been fixed.
Is it time to close?

Comment 4

[Thomas Wisniewski [:twisniewski]]

Sure.