Closed
Bug 200305
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
In <navigator.js>, JS "Error: popupManager.getEnumerator is not a function". (on clicking "OK" after changing the 'Block unrequested popup windows' checkbox value)
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Preferences, defect)
SeaMonkey
Preferences
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 221232
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: shliang)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 obsolete file)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030401
This one appeared between v1.3 and v1.4a !?
Reproducible: Didn't try
Steps to Reproduce:
(I am not sure of what triggered this error.)
Actual Results:
[
Error: popupManager.getEnumerator is not a function
Source File: chrome://navigator/content/navigator.js
Line: 171
]
PS:
*Is there any meta-bug to block for all the Chrome js error bugs around ?
*Theses bugs do not seem to create any trouble, except they all clutter the
JS.C. output, thus it's quite difficult to find "real" problems.
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
> except they all clutter the JS.C. output
There's a preference for this; distributors who want to (eg Netscape) can turn
it off.
shliang, this error sounds like something you'd know about...
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Re comment 1:
I assume that you think about 'Debug > Show chrome JavaScript errors and
warnings' UI.
Additions to my Description:
*"meta-bug to block for all": I meant to use it as a tracker in Bugzilla, to
enhance visibility.
*"all clutter the JS.C.": I wanted to point out that unlike (at this point) this
bug which seems new, there are a few longstanding ones which clutter ... while
looking for new (chrome) ones.
reassign
Assignee: asa → shliang
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
the popup pref listener wasn't changed to reflect recent changes to
permissions, but those lines aren't needed anymore anyway because we don't
support blacklists anymore
Attachment #119216 -
Flags: superreview?(jaggernaut)
Attachment #119216 -
Flags: review?(danm)
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 119216 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
sr=jag
Attachment #119216 -
Flags: superreview?(jaggernaut) → superreview+
Attachment #119216 -
Flags: review?(danm) → review+
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Will the patch land for v1.4f, or may be in v1.5a ?
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
Will this land before 1.5 final?
A few duplicates of this have been found: 208090 and 189869
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 208090 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624] (W98SE)
See bug 208090 description for reproductible testcase:
the error happens on clicking "OK" after changing the checkbox value.
Code location in current trunk is
<http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/xpfe/browser/resources/content/navigator.js#172>.
Bug happens on W95B (description), W98SE (this comment), W2K (bug 208090).
Changing:
*(Component) Browser-General -> Preferences
*(OS) W95 -> W98 [since I upgraded eventually :->]
Asking for 'blocking1.4.x', since there is an approved patch waiting for landing
for months.
Component: Browser-General → Preferences
Flags: blocking1.4.x?
OS: Windows 95 → Windows 98
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
Re comment 7:
I checked your bug 189869 comment 4;
but I guess that that bug is unrelated to this bug, is it not !?
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
The javascript attached in bug 189869 causes "popupManager.getEnumerator is not
a function" to appear in the Javascript Console. I had thought that fixing the
popup error would resolve the bug with the Javascript and allow the popup window
to appear. I could be wrong on that.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
Re comment 11:
I believe you're right (not wrong);
but see my bug 189869 comment 5:
I would be ready to add "blocks: 189869";
but I didn't find any clue about this in that other bug yet...
(I'd like to experience it myself before acting)
Updated•23 years ago
|
Flags: blocking1.4.1? → blocking1.4.1-
| Reporter | ||
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030827] (W98SE)
Line number update: 171 -> 172
{
Error: popupManager.getEnumerator is not a function
Source File: chrome://navigator/content/navigator.js
Line: 172
}
(Shliang) Still noone to land your 2reviewed patch ??
Summary: In <chrome://navigator/content/navigator.js>, JavaScript "Error: popupManager.getEnumerator is not a function" → In <chrome://navigator/content/navigator.js>, JavaScript "Error: popupManager.getEnumerator is not a function". (on clicking "OK" after changing the 'Block unrequested popup windows' checkbox value)
Updated•23 years ago
|
QA Contact: asa
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
Patch has bitrotted; do we still see this error?
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
Repro from bug 208090 WFM - 2004011308/trunk/W2K
| Reporter | ||
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208] (W98SE)
WorksForMe confirmed :-)
The code was changed in: (bug 221232 is duplicate of current bug !)
{
1.520 mvl%exedo.nl Oct 31 2003 nsIPopupManager.getEnumerator is replaced by
nsIPermissionManager.getEnumerator
bug 221232, r=dwitte, sr=bryner
}
Still, in comment 4, shliang wrote
{
those lines aren't needed anymore anyway because we don't support blacklists anymore
}
jag:
Should I update the patch to remove these lines !?
Depends on: 221232
Updated•21 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
| Reporter | ||
Comment 17•21 years ago
|
||
Neil:
Could you help answering comment 6 ?
OS: Windows 98 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Summary: In <chrome://navigator/content/navigator.js>, JavaScript "Error: popupManager.getEnumerator is not a function". (on clicking "OK" after changing the 'Block unrequested popup windows' checkbox value) → In <navigator.js>, JS "Error: popupManager.getEnumerator is not a function". (on clicking "OK" after changing the 'Block unrequested popup windows' checkbox value)
Whiteboard: [Related issue remains: see comment 16]
Comment 18•21 years ago
|
||
Maybe mvl knows, or maybe we should just resolve this bug as dup of 221232
Comment 19•21 years ago
|
||
The answer to comment 6 is ofcourse 6, given that it didn't happen. And there
isn't anything we can do to change that.
If you mean comment 16, that would be a new bug. The bug as reported here is fixed.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 221232 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
| Reporter | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #119216 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Reporter | ||
Comment 20•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #19)
> If you mean comment 16, that would be a new bug. The bug as reported here is
fixed.
Yes, I meant comment 16 :-/
I thought this bug could have been morphed; anyway, I filed bug 279479 !
| Reporter | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [Related issue remains: see comment 16]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•