Closed
Bug 236076
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Attachment name unecessarily truncated
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Mail Window Front End, enhancement)
Thunderbird
Mail Window Front End
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Thunderbird0.9
People
(Reporter: mozilla, Assigned: mscott)
References
Details
Attachments
(4 files)
20040228 trunk
When displaying a message, Thunderbird's attachment widget truncates attachment
file names at 13 characters even though there is a mile of screen real estate left.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
This thing has room for a small poem, and yet it's truncated.
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
It seems like we use the same method for both thunderbird and mozill-mail. In
the latter, we really have to truncate as we do now. As reported here, in
thunderbird, we have plenty of room.
Severity: normal → enhancement
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Another voice to say "me too". I receive a lot of long name attachment and this
restriction is frustrating.
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 242965 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
The screenshot from bug 242965 shows another aspect of this bug
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
I would suggest to raise this bug as "security-critical" because the filename
extension is also cut-off which makes it even easier for viruses to be clicked
at. Definitely something that should NOT be the case with such a beautiful
mailer as thunderbird!
(In reply to comment #6)
> I would suggest to raise this bug as "security-critical" because the filename
> extension is also cut-off which makes it even easier for viruses to be
clicked
> at. Definitely something that should NOT be the case with such a beautiful
> mailer as thunderbird!
This just happened to myself, though I usually pay much attention. Yet I was
fooled : see the attached image. Without an antivirus, I would have catched
W32.Sober.G !
To begin with, only the *central part* of the name should be abbreviated,
something like "how to become a millionaire.eml.pif" -> "how to ...ml.pif". It
would be safer, with *minimum* coding.
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
I'd be happy to work on this bug, if someone could point me in the right
direction in the thunderbird source tree where the attachments are
drawn/ellipisified. I've used XUL and know C/C++ very well.
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
see also bug #112162
scott, this is the bug you, lorenzo, benb and I were talking about at the last
moz dev day.
Depends on: 112162
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
there must be some CSS style rule for middle abbreviation. I noticed that we can
abbreviate newsgroup names in the middle in the folder pane just fine....
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird0.9
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
Can't we just make the attachment names be inside of flexible-width XUL boxes or
something? Just so we can have the full name if it fits, and then truncate it if
there isn't room.
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
See also this screen shot. Even if it is "necessary" to truncate attachment
names, it could still be a security risk. I think it would be a good idea to
have the full filename (within reason) and a scrollbar (pine and squirrelmail
do it this way); otherwise mime digests end up looking like this.
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
Just wanting to add another voice to this. I'd love to see this fixed in
Thunderbird, and the placement of the attachment pane moved to under the message
body in Mozilla Mail. In Mozilla Mail, the attachment window causes the scroll
bars to leave the screen if the "To" or "From" headers are too long. Isn't
there a place in prefs.js or elsewhere that this could easily be modified?
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
I have a patch that removes the hard-coded limit on the width of the
attachmentname in another bug...Bug 245331
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
this is really a dupe of Bug #245331 which I just checked in for David.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 16•13 years ago
|
||
I wonder if we cannot reopen this bug, because the situation in Thunderbird 9a2 is still frustrating: we truncate name although most of the case, these are absolutely no necessity (see screen-shot).
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•