Closed
Bug 379231
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Omnibus ad-blocking bug for May
Categories
(Camino Graveyard :: Annoyance Blocking, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: alqahira, Assigned: alqahira)
References
Details
(Keywords: fixed1.8.0.13, fixed1.8.1.5, Whiteboard: [camino-1.5.1])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
4.45 KB,
patch
|
sfraser_bugs
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
Banner ad across the top here, along with some more ads in the sidebar: http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/local/display.var.1362517.0.pig_sick.php /banners/ is in the source of the banner ad image, and click2find.co.uk seems like a likely target for blocking as well.
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
Some ads here that we can probably nuke too: http://www.wlos.com/template/inews_wire/wires.national/2427c023-www.wlos.com.shtml Either the host -- sbgwebas.sbgnet.com -- or the /phpAds/ string can probably be safely blocked.
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Some Flash ads on This Old House: http://www.thisoldhouse.com/toh/tohnews/gallery/0,25895,1587613-21,00.html adremote.timeinc.net is the server, I think.
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Neatorama.com is showing Flash ads like http://neatorama.cachefly.net/img4/Dangerous-Books-for-Boys-728x90-Banner.swf
Flags: blocking1.8.1.4?
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
Simon, did you mean to pull the blocking1.8.1.4? flag here? We don't need it for Camino-only code....
Flags: blocking1.8.1.4?
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
I don't think I touched the flags. User error I guess.
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
Lots of ads on http://www.radaronline.com/, served from http://radaronline.advertserve.com/advertpro
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
Ads in iframes from http://cm.homestore.overture.com/ on pages like http://homes.realtor.com/search/listingdetail.aspx?zp=33706&mxp=26&bd=3&bth=2&typ=2&pg=4&lid=1073939483&lsn=39&srcnt=108
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
On http://www.gazette.com/articles/church_21997___article.html/pie_grace.html we can get some of the ads; they're <div id="loweradswrapper2">
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
The images on http://www.cooking.com/ are all coming from an edgesuite.net server, specifically: www.cooking.com.edgesuite.net We might want to whitelist that particular server, as the site is pretty unusable without the images (it doesn't seem to have any ads on it). cl
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
On http://www.ajc.com/gwinnett/content/metro/gwinnett/index.html An annoying Flash ad: http://view.admission.net/admission/spotlight/spotlight.swf within div[id="adrail"] and div[id="bigad"]
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•17 years ago
|
||
We need to whitelist wiki.cb.o, too; one of jeff's mockup images in stuck in a directory called "/ad/" :p
Comment 13•17 years ago
|
||
Seeing banners on http://www.mac-forums.com coming from http://juggler.inetinteractive.com/banners/
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•17 years ago
|
||
This does everything except comment 1 (/banners/ is waaay to common, and I don't see anything ad-like about the other domain) and comment 4, which is already being blocked here (we added a rule in Feb for cachefly swfs).
Attachment #267039 -
Flags: superreview?(sfraser_bugs)
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Flags: camino1.5.1?
Comment 15•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 267039 [details] [diff] [review] May Omnibus Ad-Blocking edgesuite.net isn't an ad server; it's used by Akamai: <http://www.akamai.com/html/solutions/edgesuite_delivery.html> I don't think we should block anything at edgesuite.net (and the cooking.com stuff looks more like product promotion that ads to me).
Attachment #267039 -
Flags: superreview?(sfraser_bugs) → superreview-
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•17 years ago
|
||
Yieldmanager is actually using edgesuite.net for ads (bug 372612 comment 2 and bug 376270 comment 5), as is adinterax (bug 372612 comment 4); I'll change those rules to block just the yieldmanager- and adinterax-specific subdomains, and then remove the whitelist rule for cooking.com.
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•17 years ago
|
||
This does comment 16.
Attachment #267039 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #267060 -
Flags: superreview?(sfraser_bugs)
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #267060 -
Flags: superreview?(sfraser_bugs) → superreview+
Comment 18•17 years ago
|
||
Checked in on trunk and MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH.
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•17 years ago
|
||
Approved for 1.5.1 per irc; nominating for 1.0.6.
Flags: camino1.5.1?
Flags: camino1.5.1+
Flags: camino1.0.6?
Comment 22•17 years ago
|
||
Landed on CAMINO_1_5_BRANCH.
Comment 23•17 years ago
|
||
This was landed on MOZILLA_1_8_0_BRANCH as part of a sync-up through bug 383016.
Flags: camino1.0.6? → camino1.0.6+
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Keywords: fixed1.8.0.13
Whiteboard: [camino-1.5.1]
Comment 24•7 years ago
|
||
Where is this original bug? Im starting to see it across a number of my websites at the following links: http://luxuryflooringinc.com/ http://www.agcmedia.ca/ http://kongafitness.ca/ http://agcelectronicsplus.com/ http://www.weddingsnmedia.com/ If you have come across this bug and know what the fix was. please inform me.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•