473814 - RSS feed has no style information

Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 473760

(Firefox Graveyard :: RSS Discovery and Preview, defect)

Description

[Ria Klaassen (not reading all bugmail)]

Since today the following feed has no style anymore; it is displayed as xml tree:
http://kopen.marktplaats.nl/opensearch.php?b=1&q=eettafel&g=504&u=1949&ts=0&pa=1&t=1&s=10

Regression range appears to be:  http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?startdate=2009-01-14+00%3A00%3A00&enddate=2009-01-14+12%3A00%3A00
so maybe caused by Bug 453441.

Comment 1

[Ria Klaassen (not reading all bugmail)]

I see also problems with the feeds here: http://www.nu.nl/
When I click on one I get the download dialog: "You have chosen to open" "algemeen.rss" "which is a RSS file" "What should Minefield do with this file?"

Comment 2

[Jonas Sicking (:sicking) No longer reading bugmail consistently]

Do we use XSLT for any feed stuff? Otherwise bug 453441 is probably not the cause here.

Comment 3

[pal-moz]

(In reply to comment #1)
> I see also problems with the feeds here: http://www.nu.nl/
> When I click on one I get the download dialog: "You have chosen to open"
> "algemeen.rss" "which is a RSS file" "What should Minefield do with this file?"

same with mozillazine rss, http://www.mozillazine.org/


(In reply to comment #0)
> Since today the following feed has no style anymore; it is displayed as xml
> tree:
> http://kopen.marktplaats.nl/opensearch.php?b=1&q=eettafel&g=504&u=1949&ts=0&pa=1&t=1&s=10

also AMO, https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
and Mozilla Japan, http://mozilla.jp/

so all rss seems to be with no style.

Comment 4

[Peter Van der Beken [:peterv]]

(In reply to comment #0)
> Regression range appears to be: 
> http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?startdate=2009-01-14+00%3A00%3A00&enddate=2009-01-14+12%3A00%3A00
> so maybe caused by Bug 453441.

Why would it be caused by that patch? WFM on a trunk build BTW.

Comment 5

[Marco Bonardo [:mak]]

WFM on both branch and trunk (WinXP)

IIRC a couple days ago something caused a bad upgrade, we had users complaining about microsummary service not being initialized and so on, since some file was missing, so these issues could be connected to that.

Comment 6

[Marco Bonardo [:mak]]

since Ria see the issue in a trybuild i generated with only part of that range, we can probably restrict to
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=b93de60dcb8e&tochange=239d33c00bad

Comment 7

[Marco Bonardo [:mak]]

could be bug 467862

Comment 9

[Peter van der Woude [:Peter6]]

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090116 Minefield/3.2a1pre ID:20090116082607

verified dup, feeds wok again