Closed
Bug 50523
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
Update Name of null plugin
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Plug-ins, defect, P3)
Core Graveyard
Plug-ins
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla0.9
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: BenB)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [remind][rtm-])
Attachments
(1 file)
3.85 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
When right-clicing on the NPNUL32.DLL file in the plugins directory you can get the see in the Version tab that the file says it's copyrighted by Netscape, 1997, etc... This should be updated to say something about Mozilla instead! The code for the copyright stuff: http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/modules/plugin/default/windows/npnul32.rc# 76
The file name ought to be changed as well ("np" obviously stands for "Netscape plugin", when what we really mean is "Mozilla plugin"), but that probably deserves a different bug report. This might not *quite* be an API issue, but it's close enough. Making a blocker for bug 35548.
Blocks: 35548
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
bradne, do you have an CVS account? If yes, just fix it right away.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Taking bug.
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Summary: Update Version info on NPNUL32.DLL → Update Name of null plugin
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
av, please review <http://www.bucksch.org/1/projects/mozilla/review.html>. The Win32 change is untested - I have no Win32 build environment. Please test it, including <about:plugins> and the DLL info.
Changes look OK to me. I applied it on Windows, and everything works fine. a=av
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
av, who should give a review?
I think to get the fix in you should escalate the bug and get rtm+ status in the Whiteboard, then send it to the team of reviewers as described on the top of the tinderbox page. Nominating for rtm.
Keywords: rtm
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
Erm, we're in the process of rewriting the plugin to be XPCOM instead of n4.x, I'll make sure that it doesn't say netscape assuming we've decided to rename the plugin "Mozilla Default Plugin" or would we prefer for the plugin to be polymorphic "&Branding; Default Plugin" [i'm not sure of the correct entity but you get the point]. Marking [remind] because i'll need to check on this when an xpcom null plugin lands.
Whiteboard: [remind]
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
ETA?
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
Andrei, please make sure you don't spend more than five minutes on this bug. We have numerous outstanding plug-in bugs that actually cause user-visible failures (crashes, PDT forms not submitting, RealPlayer not working, QuickTime failing to display) so we absolutely can't afford to be spending your time on this bug until we're certain that all these other bugs that actually harm users will get fixed for RTM. (We could live with the erroneous copyright issue for RTM; Netscape won't enforce a copyright notice that was asserted by accident and it could be fixed after RTM. Sounds like you'll fix that during the XPCOM rewrite anyway though. BTW, what's the motivation for the XPCOM rewrite at this point?) Many thanks to all who are working on this bug; if you can reassign the bug to yourself and handle the check-in for Andrei, many thanks!
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
ops, I thought, it were assigned to me. Taking bug again. timeless doesn't know when he'll get to rewrite the backend. It surely might be a good idea, because the old one is Netscape-centristic (unsurprisingly). Anyway, we should get this in before mozilla0.9. ekrock, Netscape might be in hot times, but it also has responsibilities towards mozilla.org. There are distributions other than Netscape 6, and the world doesn't stop while Netscape is busy. But I think, av's part in this bug is done.
Assignee: av → mozilla
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
These changes seem reasonable; av built on Windows ... so, sr=scc.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
scc, I now have a=av and sr=scc collected. Do I need an r=?
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
As I understand it, no. Since av has super-review powers for this module, and I have super-review powers in general, you can count either one of as the reviewer and the other as the super-reviewer. One review + one super-review is enough for an external contributor to check into the trunk (normal open-and-green rules still apply, of course).
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
Checked in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
Verified. The plugin properties now says mozilla.org as company name, etc....
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
Please verify for Linux and Windows. The changes are not XP.
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•24 years ago
|
||
.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 21•24 years ago
|
||
verified on windows trunk 1128. I looked in the properties menu option for the null plugin on linux but there is no specific name mentioned. Looks ok..unless I missed something.Marking VERIFIED.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•2 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•