Closed Bug 509268 Opened 15 years ago Closed 15 years ago

Attachment icon is big compared to the other elements

Categories

(Thunderbird :: Folder and Message Lists, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED
Thunderbird 3.0rc1

People

(Reporter: andreasn, Assigned: andreasn)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 2 obsolete files)

In the beta3 feedback, one of the points that came up is that the attachment icon is big compared to the other elements in the message list.
We should look into having a smaller one. Either the same size as the header icon, or something in between that and the current one.
Blocks: 415415, 488061
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Using the same size as the header image.
Not sure if this makes it _too_ small or not.
Attached patch patch for qute (obsolete) — Splinter Review
If I remember correctly we used the attachment.png for the attachment reminder so it would be good to keep around a size that continues to work for that.  It could be as a new image, attachment-reminder.png
(In reply to comment #3)
> If I remember correctly we used the attachment.png for the attachment reminder

As far as I can see, the attachment reminder uses the graphics from the compose toolbar.

/mail/themes/gnomestripe/mail/compose/messengercompose.css, line 229:

#attachmentNotificationBox > notification .messageImage {
  width: 22px;
  height: 22px;
  background-image: url(chrome://messenger/skin/messengercompose/compose-toolbar.png);
  background-position: left -66px;
}
oh right,  my bad
don't forget to put these up for review
What about to do the same thing for other icons in the message list? In my opinion smaller icons (those ones of column header) for starred and, in particular, for junk status would be better.
Attachment #395302 - Flags: ui-review?(clarkbw)
Attachment #395302 - Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Comment on attachment 395303 [details] [diff] [review]
patch for qute

just tested this out and it looks good to me.
Attachment #395302 - Flags: ui-review?(clarkbw)
Attachment #395302 - Flags: ui-review+
Attachment #395302 - Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Attachment #395302 - Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Comment on attachment 395302 [details] [diff] [review]
[checked in] patch for gnomestripe

looks good to me.  I'll switch the code review over to magnus, we gave philor a bunch of windows bugs already
Assignee: nobody → nisses.mail
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 3.0b4
Comment on attachment 395302 [details] [diff] [review]
[checked in] patch for gnomestripe

Quite nice indeed! r=mkmelin
Attachment #395302 - Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla) → review+
Does this need another review for attachment 395303 [details] [diff] [review] or is it ready
for a "checkin-needed" flag?

(In reply to comment #7)
> What about to do the same thing for other icons in the message list? In my
> opinion smaller icons (those ones of column header) for starred and, in
> particular, for junk status would be better.

You'd probably have to file new bugs for those if not yet present, this bug is about the attachment icon and is close to done.
Comment on attachment 395303 [details] [diff] [review]
patch for qute

As attachment.png is only "used" in searchDialog.css, it should also be removed completely, and the searchDialog.css ref updated. Not that the searchdialog currently has any attachment col, but we might add one i suppose...
Attachment #395303 - Flags: review-
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [checkin-needed for the gnomestripe patch]
Comment on attachment 395302 [details] [diff] [review]
[checked in] patch for gnomestripe

Checked in: http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/6e8d1b550421
Attachment #395302 - Attachment description: patch for gnomestripe → [checked in] patch for gnomestripe
Flags: in-testsuite-
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [checkin-needed for the gnomestripe patch]
Attached patch updated qute patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #395303 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #401203 - Flags: ui-review+
Attachment #401203 - Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Comment on attachment 401203 [details] [diff] [review]
updated qute patch

Does this build?
attachment.png is still there in mail/themes/qute/jar.mn
Attachment #401203 - Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla) → review-
Comment on attachment 401203 [details] [diff] [review]
updated qute patch

Minusing as i expect the answer is no
Attached patch updated patchSplinter Review
hopefully this one works better!
Attachment #401203 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #402820 - Flags: ui-review+
Attachment #402820 - Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Attachment #402820 - Attachment is patch: true
Attachment #402820 - Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Attachment #402820 - Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla) → review+
Comment on attachment 402820 [details] [diff] [review]
updated patch

a-tb3=mkmelin as well
Attachment #402820 - Flags: approval-thunderbird3+
http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/af8d52631eb5

Optimistically closing, since Pinstripe looks fine to me, and I really really like bugs that only get one checkin, rather than multiples across multiple milestones.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: Thunderbird 3.0b4 → Thunderbird 3.0rc1
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: