Closed
Bug 515422
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Make sure the autoconfig window is usable with any OS theme colors
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, defect)
Thunderbird
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Thunderbird 3.0rc1
People
(Reporter: andreasn, Assigned: andreasn)
References
Details
(Keywords: access, Whiteboard: [no l10n impact][linux fixed][windows in progress in bug 517171])
Attachments
(6 files, 3 obsolete files)
33.47 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
223.92 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
51.33 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
92.48 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
340 bytes,
patch
|
standard8
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.08 KB,
patch
|
philor
:
review+
andreasn
:
ui-review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
the new autoconfig window currently use a blue tinted background color. Should make it use -moz-dialog instead.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 399507 [details] [diff] [review]
patch to fix the issue
Standard8 said this could go in b4 as long as I got a UI ok from Bryan.
Attachment #399507 -
Flags: ui-review?(clarkbw)
Attachment #399507 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 399507 [details] [diff] [review]
patch to fix the issue
yep
Attachment #399507 -
Flags: ui-review?(clarkbw) → ui-review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
Awww, we've lost the beautiful grouping background rounded rectangles... :(
(i.e. https://bug506290.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=399339)
Would it make more sense to find a different color from https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/color_value ? Or to not set it at all, and see what happens?
Thanks,
Blake.
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
"-moz-dialog" seems to be a nice enough color on all three platforms.
How about we use that?
Later,
Blake.
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
Wait, that's what you're using. Man, I'm apparently too tired to be commenting on bugs. Sorry about that. Let me just close with "Do you want to make that change to all three platforms?"
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Ah, the joy of making near-freeze bug comments :)
What we want to do is what I should have done before reviewing: take a screenshot to see what should be visible, then switch Linux to High Contrast Inverse, and Windows to Classic, High Contrast Black (or whatever the Vista/7 equivalent is), since those are most likely to show pain, and see what's actually hidden by having a background but no color, or a color but no background, or one of them that assumes the other will be something it's not. From a quick glance, what's invisible looks like "nearly everything in gnomestripe, but not much in qute other than disabled menulists being rather white on white."
All/All is actually a bit broad: conveniently, since OS X doesn't really _do_ OS theming, it's actually just qute/gnomestripe that need worrying about.
Assignee: nobody → nisses.mail
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3?
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Summary: autoconfig window use a blueish background → Make sure the autoconfig window is usable with any OS theme colors
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 3.0b4
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 399615 [details]
Linux, Mac, and Windows, in that order.
that windows shot looks horrible :( everything else is ok.
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
This is why I'm thinking blocker, and wanting more than just one background fixed - the particularly unsavory Linux image does actually have everything filled in, despite the way we're mocking people who need high contrast white on black by giving them white on white and white on blue-grey.
Attachment #399507 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #399507 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
I'd agree this is blocking the TB3 release but I'd suggest a milestone of rc1 because I don't think we need to hold the b4 release on this. Not to say we shouldn't aim to get patches in by Friday.
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Agreed, it doesn't need to block b4 - wanted though, but we should sort it for rc1.
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3? → blocking-thunderbird3+
Target Milestone: Thunderbird 3.0b4 → Thunderbird 3.0rc1
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
This takes care of the HC issues on Linux. Will look into if these things can be shared across the themes or not, so not asking for review yet.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [no l10n impact]
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
Here is a updated patch for gnomestripe using -moz-appearance: -moz-dialog; instead of -moz-appearance: window;
Works great with HighContrast and other themes.
Attachment #399720 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #400010 -
Flags: ui-review?(clarkbw)
Attachment #400010 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•16 years ago
|
||
this takes care of the background color issue. Still having issues with the inactive dropdowns, so those will come later.
Comment 16•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 400010 [details] [diff] [review]
updated gnomestripe patch
this looks fine. I'm not sure philor is going to like your commenting approach to the CSS change. Lets see how he's feeling :)
Attachment #400010 -
Flags: ui-review?(clarkbw) → ui-review+
Comment 17•16 years ago
|
||
Typo there - you got the word "not" too early, instead of in "is not going to like" :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•16 years ago
|
||
Indeed, how ugly of me. Fixed!
Attachment #400144 -
Flags: ui-review+
Attachment #400144 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #400010 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #400010 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #400144 -
Flags: review?(philringnalda) → review+
Comment 19•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 400144 [details] [diff] [review]
[checked in] patch without commented out stuff
V. nice.
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #400034 -
Flags: review+
Comment 20•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 400034 [details] [diff] [review]
[checked in] first stab at the windows patch
Checked in: http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/fc63f7910dd2
Attachment #400034 -
Attachment description: first stab at the windows patch → [checked in] first stab at the windows patch
Comment 21•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 400144 [details] [diff] [review]
[checked in] patch without commented out stuff
Checked in: http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/0d54d4b5f11f
Attachment #400144 -
Attachment description: patch without commented out stuff → [checked in] patch without commented out stuff
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [no l10n impact] → [no l10n impact][linux fixed][windows in progress]
Comment 22•16 years ago
|
||
looks like the rest of the windows pieces will be handled by bug 517171
Blocks: 517171
Whiteboard: [no l10n impact][linux fixed][windows in progress] → [no l10n impact][linux fixed][windows in progress in bug 517171]
Updated•16 years ago
|
Comment 23•16 years ago
|
||
marking this fixed and setting bug 517171 as the blocker to handle the rest of the work
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•