Closed
Bug 594299
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
(d3d9-layers)inFlasher doesn't flash
Categories
(Other Applications :: DOM Inspector, defect)
Tracking
(blocking2.0 -)
RESOLVED
INVALID
mozilla2.0
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| blocking2.0 | --- | - |
People
(Reporter: alice0775, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows torNT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b6pre)
Gecko/20100907 Firefox/4.0b6pre ID:20100907041859
inIFlasher doesn't flash.
If I set layers.accelerate-all to false, it works.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start Minefield with new profile
2. Install DOM inspector ( https://addons.mozilla.org/ja/firefox/addon/6622/ )
3. Inspect any element
Actual Results:
inIFlasher doesn't flash
Graphics
Adapter Description: ATI Radeon HD 4300/4500 Series
Vendor ID: 1002
Device ID: 954f
Adapter RAM: 512
Adapter Drivers: aticfx64 aticfx64 aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atiumdag
atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64
Driver Version: 8.762.0.0
Driver Date: 8-3-2010
Direct2D Enabled: true
DirectWrite Enabled: true
GPU Accelerated Layers Enabled: 1/1 Direct3D 9
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
According to https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/2010-09-07#Firefox_Development,
Implement of Inspector was dropped from Firefox 4.
So, I think this should be fixed before release of Firefox4.
blocking2.0: --- → ?
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Eh? Two things:
a) The devtools inspector (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Projects/Inspector) uses a different method for its highlighter; it's not inFlasher.
b) Even if it were the case that the devtools inspector did use inFlasher, the fact that it was dropped from Firefox 4 would imply that this shouldn't be blocking, *not* that it should be...
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
blocking2.0: ? → ---
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Summary: (d3d9-layers)inIFlasher doesn't flash → (d3d9-layers)inFlasher doesn't flash
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> Eh? Two things:
> a) The devtools inspector (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Projects/Inspector)
> uses a different method for its highlighter; it's not inFlasher.
> b) Even if it were the case that the devtools inspector did use inFlasher, the
> fact that it was dropped from Firefox 4 would imply that this shouldn't be
> blocking, *not* that it should be...
Note that this is new breakage on a platform that inIFlasher actually worked on - windows. This isn't really the same as bug 368608.
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> Note that this is new breakage on a platform that inIFlasher actually worked on
> - windows. This isn't really the same as bug 368608.
The effect is the same though, right? "Rewrite DOM Inspector's flasher"? The platform fields for that bug are already All/All.
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> The effect is the same though, right? "Rewrite DOM Inspector's flasher"? The
> platform fields for that bug are already All/All.
It's not clear to me that that is the case.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
This is about Extention DOMi's blinking feature.
I think this is not bug 368608 completely.
Because, Blinking of DOMi works before enabling D3D9.
And It still works if I disabled D3D9.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
This is regression,
is this block 2.0?
Updated•14 years ago
|
blocking2.0: ? → -
Has this been fixed in nightly builds or preview releases?
I can confirm that unchecking "User hardware acceleration when available" is a workaround if blinking is not working. My video card is NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS. I am developing a web application that heavily utilizes Canvas and SVG so I would much prefer not to have to disable hardware acceleration. Is there are less drastic workaround?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Flasher in DOMi was rewrited in Nightly 33.0a1
So, this bug is obsoleted.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago → 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
| Reporter | ||
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
s/rewrited/rewritten/
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•