Closed
Bug 594299
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
(d3d9-layers)inFlasher doesn't flash
Categories
(Other Applications :: DOM Inspector, defect)
Tracking
(blocking2.0 -)
RESOLVED
INVALID
mozilla2.0
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
blocking2.0 | --- | - |
People
(Reporter: alice0775, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows torNT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b6pre) Gecko/20100907 Firefox/4.0b6pre ID:20100907041859 inIFlasher doesn't flash. If I set layers.accelerate-all to false, it works. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Start Minefield with new profile 2. Install DOM inspector ( https://addons.mozilla.org/ja/firefox/addon/6622/ ) 3. Inspect any element Actual Results: inIFlasher doesn't flash Graphics Adapter Description: ATI Radeon HD 4300/4500 Series Vendor ID: 1002 Device ID: 954f Adapter RAM: 512 Adapter Drivers: aticfx64 aticfx64 aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Driver Version: 8.762.0.0 Driver Date: 8-3-2010 Direct2D Enabled: true DirectWrite Enabled: true GPU Accelerated Layers Enabled: 1/1 Direct3D 9
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
According to https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/2010-09-07#Firefox_Development, Implement of Inspector was dropped from Firefox 4. So, I think this should be fixed before release of Firefox4.
blocking2.0: --- → ?
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Eh? Two things: a) The devtools inspector (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Projects/Inspector) uses a different method for its highlighter; it's not inFlasher. b) Even if it were the case that the devtools inspector did use inFlasher, the fact that it was dropped from Firefox 4 would imply that this shouldn't be blocking, *not* that it should be...
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
blocking2.0: ? → ---
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Summary: (d3d9-layers)inIFlasher doesn't flash → (d3d9-layers)inFlasher doesn't flash
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2) > Eh? Two things: > a) The devtools inspector (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/Projects/Inspector) > uses a different method for its highlighter; it's not inFlasher. > b) Even if it were the case that the devtools inspector did use inFlasher, the > fact that it was dropped from Firefox 4 would imply that this shouldn't be > blocking, *not* that it should be... Note that this is new breakage on a platform that inIFlasher actually worked on - windows. This isn't really the same as bug 368608.
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > Note that this is new breakage on a platform that inIFlasher actually worked on > - windows. This isn't really the same as bug 368608. The effect is the same though, right? "Rewrite DOM Inspector's flasher"? The platform fields for that bug are already All/All.
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4) > The effect is the same though, right? "Rewrite DOM Inspector's flasher"? The > platform fields for that bug are already All/All. It's not clear to me that that is the case.
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
This is about Extention DOMi's blinking feature. I think this is not bug 368608 completely. Because, Blinking of DOMi works before enabling D3D9. And It still works if I disabled D3D9.
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
This is regression, is this block 2.0?
Updated•13 years ago
|
blocking2.0: ? → -
Has this been fixed in nightly builds or preview releases? I can confirm that unchecking "User hardware acceleration when available" is a workaround if blinking is not working. My video card is NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS. I am developing a web application that heavily utilizes Canvas and SVG so I would much prefer not to have to disable hardware acceleration. Is there are less drastic workaround?
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Flasher in DOMi was rewrited in Nightly 33.0a1 So, this bug is obsoleted.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago → 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
s/rewrited/rewritten/
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•