Closed Bug 600569 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago
Version string in "About" window should show build date for "pre" versions
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100928 Firefox/4.0b7pre Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100928 Firefox/4.0b7pre Every milestone Firefox is same (all 3.6 are same, all 4.0b5 are same) but it doesn't apply to "pre" versions - two 4.0b7pre builds can be different Reproducible: Always
The build ID in about:support can tell you that information. I agree that a build date would be nice, but adding a date string to the about window proved to be problematic, so it was removed in bug 596905.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Depends on: 598367
Ever confirmed: true
I don't think that it should be in "human readable" format - it's ONLY FOR PRE RELEASES so it's rather not for typical users and just "yyyymmdd" for everybody would be enough. Is it still a problem? Anyway, "won't fix" is not a problem for me, but please consider my comment #3 in bug 598169
I agree, this would be very useful for nightly users, and wouldn't burden release users any.
This includes the build date in the about dialog if the build's version contains "pre". Some Linux distros might ship "release" builds this way, but we won't (our build automation doesn't let that happen), so this should only impact a minority of users (who are most likely to care about build IDs).
Comment on attachment 494324 [details] [diff] [review] patch Yes, please. :)
Attachment #494324 - Flags: ui-review?(limi) → ui-review+
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 4.0b8
That's good for those that stick to just nightly builds, but the ones of us nut-cases that also use/run several hourly maybe in one day, it does not provide much info. The addition of the current cset would have been nice if you going to the trouble to display the date.
(In reply to comment #1) > The build ID in about:support can tell you that information. I don't think so. bug 601946
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.