Closed Bug 635355 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

[meta] Use animations in UI to make it more eye appealing

Categories

(Firefox :: General, enhancement)

enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: Terepin, Unassigned)

References

(Depends on 2 open bugs)

Details

(Keywords: meta, Whiteboard: [parity-chrome][parity-opera][parity-ie])

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b12pre) Gecko/20110218 Firefox/4.0b12pre
Build Identifier: 

In Firefox 4 only tabs are using animations. But those can be used also on menus, DH panels, lists etc. Too many animations would be distracting, so the usage is up to UX team to be decided.

Animations are being used by all three major web browsers, so this is also for parity with 'em.

Reproducible: Always
Keywords: uiwanted
Whiteboard: [parity-chrome][parity-opera][parity-ie]
I agree, if not overused, like before mentioned, and really discreet. More fading effects on hovered elements (like already used for some of the navigation buttons' glow effect) wouldn't hurt (except the performance a bit). Could be turned off by users choice or if HWAcc. is deactivated.
Depends on: 610545, 639153, 639154, 639155, 639159
Depends on: 455694
Please consider adding them as dependency:
Bug 373266
Bug 378276
Bug 542862
Component: Theme → General
Keywords: uiwantedmeta
QA Contact: theme → general
Component: General → Theme
Depends on: 373266, 542862, 378276
Keywords: metauiwanted
Thanks for tips!
You accidentally changed the keyword and component back. Dao changed the keyword to 'meta' and the component to 'General'.
Upps, sorry.
Component: Theme → General
Keywords: uiwantedmeta
Does this Meta bug also depend on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536540 - particularly useful for CSS transition of the Fx button in this bug.
Dunno, I'm leaving that to Dao.
Depends on: 333564
Version: unspecified → Trunk
WONTFIXing this bug, because the primary purpose of adding animations to the Firefox UI should not be arbitrary eye appeal and because the dependencies in this bug are not prioritized nor triaged by the people who would be driving the project or working on it.

See bug 657423 for the project bug.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
I wonder why I'm even trying to fill bugs. They're either unconfirmed, dead or wontfix. ;(

I suppose you want mark depending bugs as WONTFIX as well. Shall I do it myself instead?
Oh yeah, just to be sure, this isn't any personal attack against you, just my expression of disappointment.
It's often not useful to file broad, far-reaching bugs (like meta bugs) unless the person filing them is actively working on the problem (and even then, such bugs have historically become less useful the longer they remain open).

I think you'll find it more productive to _discuss_ such things with UX and developers, get them on the active radar, and then find ways to help implement specific things.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.