Closed
Bug 664728
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
update plugins used by talos
Categories
(Testing :: Talos, defect)
Testing
Talos
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: anodelman, Assigned: anodelman)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 2 obsolete files)
1.36 KB,
patch
|
bear
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.73 KB,
patch
|
bear
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
870 bytes,
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Talos installs plugins into the default profile per-test run. I don't believe that these have been updated in a long time.
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → anodelman
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Pulling new copies of flash today, version 10.3.183.5.
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
\o/!
Thanks, this is important to fix the shutdown regression and may let us land bug 673440 without regressing.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
Don't get too excited just yet - still need to do some staging before this is ready to get deployed.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
So, during testing I'm finding some exceptions that will have to be handled:
- we'll want to run 64 bit flash on 64 bit browsers, this would be on our win7-64bit, fedora-64bit and most mac installs (for this I'll use Beta 2 11.0.d1.98, which is the current 64 bit flash release)
- we'll still need to install 32 bit flash correctly on xp, fed and the 1.9.2 branch
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #557281 -
Flags: review?(bear)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #557281 -
Flags: review?(bear) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #557282 -
Flags: review?(bear)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
Patches green on staging. New flash zips have already been posted to the build server by lsblakk.
Flash is installed and working. Tested against nightly and 1.9.2 builds for confirmation.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #557282 -
Flags: review?(bear) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Also, I've split out:
32 bit:
- use flash version 10.3.183.5
64 bit:
- use flash version 11.0.d1.98
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
> - we'll want to run 64 bit flash on 64 bit browsers, this would be on our
> win7-64bit, fedora-64bit and most mac installs (for this I'll use Beta 2
> 11.0.d1.98, which is the current 64 bit flash release)
I don't think we want to use 64 bit flash release on mac. Our default configuration, used by our users, is to use the 64 bit browser and run 32 bit plugins using a compatibility layer. I believe this is only the case on Mac. Flash 64-bit is still beta software so I think we rather test our default configuration.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•13 years ago
|
||
So, that would mean only 64 bit on fed64 and win764. I'll try and get some new zips and patch changes pulled together.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #557282 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #557301 -
Flags: review?(bear)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #557301 -
Flags: review?(bear) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•13 years ago
|
||
Copies of flash zips have been updated on the build server by lsblakk. 32 bit flash zip now contains 10.3.183.5 for mac.
The new split is:
32 bit (fed, winxp, win7, leopard, snow leopard):
- use flash version 10.3.183.5
64 bit (fed64, win7 64):
- use flash version 11.0.d1.98
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•13 years ago
|
||
This is now waiting on deployment, which must happen during a downtime as it will affect all tp4/tp5 results.
I've not checked in the patches as I don't want them to get accidentally picked up during a non-downtime reconfig.
Comment 15•13 years ago
|
||
Do we have any measurement of the impact this will have for Talos? I'm expecting this upgrade to fix the tp5 shutdown regression. Or do we have to wait for it to be deployed?
http://graphs-new.mozilla.org/graph.html#tests=[[102,1,17]]&sel=none&displayrange=90&datatype=running
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•13 years ago
|
||
I don't have an idea of the exact impact - I have a limited number of test boxes that haven't been updated in a while. So while I can ensure that patches will go green and tests will run it isn't an exact replication of the production environment.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Flags: needs-treeclosure?
Updated•13 years ago
|
Flags: needs-treeclosure? → needs-treeclosure+
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #557281 -
Attachment description: update names of flash zips in buildbot-configs → [checked in] update names of flash zips in buildbot-configs
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #557301 -
Attachment description: download 64 bit flash for win764/fed64 only → [checked in] download 64 bit flash for win764/fed64 only
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•13 years ago
|
||
Tp tests are not run on the AddonTester branch and this option is not required there - it is also in the 'old' format instead of the new 32/64 bit split.
Attachment #561447 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #561447 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #561447 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Attachment #561448 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #561448 -
Attachment description: remove plugins option from AddonTester/AddonbaselineTester branch → [checked in] remove plugins option from AddonTester/AddonbaselineTester branch
Attachment #561448 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•13 years ago
|
||
Deployed. Done here.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•