Closed
Bug 787718
(sdk-on-fennec)
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
[meta] Implement SDK support for Native Fennec aka Firefox on Android
Categories
(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: General, defect, P4)
Add-on SDK Graveyard
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: canuckistani, Assigned: canuckistani)
References
Details
This is the tracking / blocker bug for this work.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Erik, cc'ing you. Can you ensure that all native fennec bugs you're working on block this bug?
OS: Mac OS X → All
Priority: -- → P4
Hardware: x86 → All
Summary: Implement SDK support for Native Fennec aka Firefox on Android → [meta] Implement SDK support for Native Fennec aka Firefox on Android
Updated•13 years ago
|
Updated•13 years ago
|
Alias: sdk-on-fennec
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
(New here >) Is there any effort to have ui/* support? Specifically ui/button/* in the "..." section.
I noticed some chatter from addon developers saying these would be really helpful on Android. This might open up a can of worms if there's UX tie-in, but strictly from an API perspective there doesn't seem to be any effort to support these.
@see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/SDK/Tutorials/Mobile_development#Module_Compatibility
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dave Andrews from comment #3)
Good point, we should start trying to get the ui apis to support android. Perhaps we can start with opening some bugs?
I imagine we'll have to open some platform bugs so the sooner the better.
Flags: needinfo?(zer0)
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dave Andrews from comment #3)
> I noticed some chatter from addon developers saying these would be really
> helpful on Android. This might open up a can of worms if there's UX tie-in,
> but strictly from an API perspective there doesn't seem to be any effort to
> support these.
It's still not clear the future of the Mobile Support and Add-on SDK; so no further development is planned at the moment.
Jeff, Mossop, any news about that? As we said, if we decided to fully support Mobile, we definitely need an infrastructure for automated tests, that's mandatory.
Flags: needinfo?(zer0)
Flags: needinfo?(jgriffiths)
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend+bugmail)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
You're right, we do need automated testing if we're going to support Android at all well. I have no news on that at this point.
Flags: needinfo?(jgriffiths)
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend+bugmail)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(jgriffiths)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(jgriffiths)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(jgriffiths)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(jgriffiths)
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•