Closed Bug 817945 Opened 12 years ago Closed 12 years ago

B2G MMS: Configure MMS proxy settings through SettingsService (follow-up)

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Device Interfaces, defect)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla20
blocking-b2g -
Tracking Status
firefox20 --- fixed
b2g18 --- fixed
b2g18-v1.0.0 --- wontfix
b2g18-v1.0.1 --- wontfix

People

(Reporter: airpingu, Assigned: airpingu)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

No description provided.
Attached patch PatchSplinter Review
We missed a spot... Without this, our 3G will fail. This is absolutely my bad. Feel really guilty and sorry about that.
Attachment #688104 - Flags: review?(vyang)
Attachment #688104 - Flags: review?(vyang) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla20
This bug relates to MMS features and needs to be tagged as leo+ so that we can uplift it into the b2g-18 branch.
blocking-b2g: --- → leo?
blocking-b2g: leo? → leo+
requesting uplift to 1.0.1 per bug 846230
blocking-b2g: leo+ → tef+
This is causing 3G and WiFi to fail (see bug 856997), can we back this out and look for a an alternative solution for bug 846230 that does not require to uplift this bug (that is intended for 1.1)
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
Backed out for now. The release drivers and developers will need to decide the proper way to proceed with this for v1.0.1. https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g18_v1_0_1/rev/512258bc00a3
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
This bug is aimed for a follow-up fix for bug 777251. I don't really believe it can be checked in independently...
(In reply to Gene Lian [:gene] from comment #10) > This bug is aimed for a follow-up fix for bug 777251. I don't really believe > it can be checked in independently... Then we should mark this as depending on bug 777251, right?
(In reply to Daniel Coloma:dcoloma from comment #11) > (In reply to Gene Lian [:gene] from comment #10) > > This bug is aimed for a follow-up fix for bug 777251. I don't really believe > > it can be checked in independently... > > Then we should mark this as depending on bug 777251, right? For the follow-up bug, we usually use blocking instead of depending. And I don't think it's worth uplifting the bug 777251 since it must touch lots of related MMS bugs which need to be uplifted due to the code conflict, too. Per comment #8, it'd be better to find out an branch-specific alternative to get through it.
blocking-b2g: tef+ → -
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: