B2G MMS: Configure MMS proxy settings through SettingsService (follow-up)

RESOLVED FIXED in Firefox 20

Status

()

RESOLVED FIXED
6 years ago
6 years ago

People

(Reporter: airpingu, Assigned: airpingu)

Tracking

Trunk
mozilla20
ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
Points:
---
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(blocking-b2g:-, firefox20 fixed, b2g18 fixed, b2g18-v1.0.0 wontfix, b2g18-v1.0.1 wontfix)

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment)

Comment hidden (empty)
(Assignee)

Comment 1

6 years ago
Created attachment 688104 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch

We missed a spot... Without this, our 3G will fail. This is absolutely my bad. Feel really guilty and sorry about that.
Attachment #688104 - Flags: review?(vyang)
Attachment #688104 - Flags: review?(vyang) → review+
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/9d57e279d2b0
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla20
(Assignee)

Comment 4

6 years ago
This bug relates to MMS features and needs to be tagged as leo+ so that we can uplift it into the b2g-18 branch.
blocking-b2g: --- → leo?
blocking-b2g: leo? → leo+
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g18/rev/ca183a28eab2
status-b2g18: --- → fixed
status-b2g18-v1.0.0: --- → wontfix
status-b2g18-v1.0.1: --- → wontfix
status-firefox20: --- → fixed
requesting uplift to 1.0.1 per bug 846230
blocking-b2g: leo+ → tef+
status-b2g18-v1.0.1: wontfix → affected
This is causing 3G and WiFi to fail (see bug 856997), can we back this out and look for a an alternative solution for bug 846230 that does not require to uplift this bug (that is intended for 1.1)
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
Backed out for now. The release drivers and developers will need to decide the proper way to proceed with this for v1.0.1.
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g18_v1_0_1/rev/512258bc00a3
status-b2g18-v1.0.1: fixed → affected
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
(Assignee)

Comment 10

6 years ago
This bug is aimed for a follow-up fix for bug 777251. I don't really believe it can be checked in independently...
(In reply to Gene Lian [:gene] from comment #10)
> This bug is aimed for a follow-up fix for bug 777251. I don't really believe
> it can be checked in independently...

Then we should mark this as depending on bug 777251, right?
(Assignee)

Comment 12

6 years ago
(In reply to Daniel Coloma:dcoloma from comment #11)
> (In reply to Gene Lian [:gene] from comment #10)
> > This bug is aimed for a follow-up fix for bug 777251. I don't really believe
> > it can be checked in independently...
> 
> Then we should mark this as depending on bug 777251, right?

For the follow-up bug, we usually use blocking instead of depending.

And I don't think it's worth uplifting the bug 777251 since it must touch lots of related MMS bugs which need to be uplifted due to the code conflict, too.

Per comment #8, it'd be better to find out an branch-specific alternative to get through it.

Updated

6 years ago
status-b2g18-v1.0.1: affected → wontfix

Updated

6 years ago
blocking-b2g: tef+ → -
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.