Closed Bug 835002 Opened 13 years ago Closed 12 years ago

Add back Growl support for TB19/20/21 and SM 2.16/2.17/2.18

Categories

(MailNews Core :: Backend, defect)

x86
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(thunderbird19- wontfix, thunderbird20+ fixed, seamonkey2.15 fixed, seamonkey2.16? fixed, seamonkey2.17 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
Thunderbird 21.0
Tracking Status
thunderbird19 - wontfix
thunderbird20 + fixed
seamonkey2.15 --- fixed
seamonkey2.16 ? fixed
seamonkey2.17 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: philip.chee, Assigned: Nomis101)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

We should add back GROWL support to TB19/20 and SM 2.16/2.17 since Firefox is doing it in Bug 827979. +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #806254 +++ > If Bug 805837 adds back Growl support to Gecko 18, we should also reverse > the changes we have done in Bug 792793 for comm-aurora. Bug 827979 - add Growl support back for Firefox 19 (Beta) and Firefox 20 (Aurora) From Bug 827979 Comment 0: > My understanding is that XUL notifications will come from bug 782211 but > that has still not been completed. I think we should add growl back to 19 > and 20 for the same reason as we did for 18.
Comment on attachment 706828 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for TB19 / SM2.16 [Approval Request Comment] Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): Bug 827979 User impact if declined: No notification support at all on OS X Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): No risk, same patch as in Bug 806254
Attachment #706828 - Flags: review?(mbanner)
Attachment #706828 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Comment on attachment 706829 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for TB20 / SM2.17 [Approval Request Comment] Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): Bug 827979 User impact if declined: No notification support at all on OS X Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): No risk, same patch as in Bug 806254
Attachment #706829 - Flags: review?(mbanner)
Attachment #706829 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
By the way, both patches are the same and the same as the patch for Bug 806254. But made from different branches.
Comment on attachment 706828 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for TB19 / SM2.16 wrong flags, resetting.
Attachment #706828 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-comm-beta?
Attachment #706829 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-comm-aurora?
Yay! WFM now. Hadn't realized how much I'd miss Growl. Thanks! Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:19.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/19.0 SeaMonkey/2.16 Build identifier: 20130130211905
Comment on attachment 706828 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for TB19 / SM2.16 If the SM team want to take this or not, that's up to them. We're not going to be releasing another beta of TB in this cycle.
Attachment #706828 - Flags: review?(mbanner) → review?(bugspam.Callek)
Bumping versions in title, since bug 827979 also landed growl support back on mozilla-central.
Summary: Add back Growl support for TB19/20 and SM 2.16/2.17 → Add back Growl support for TB19/20/21 and SM 2.16/2.17/2.18
Comment on attachment 706829 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for TB20 / SM2.17 Looks good to me.
Assignee: nobody → Nomis101
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 21.0
Attachment #706829 - Flags: review?(mbanner)
Attachment #706829 - Flags: review+
Attachment #706829 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
Attachment #706829 - Flags: approval-comm-aurora+
Comment on attachment 706828 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for TB19 / SM2.16 Probably worth asking stefanh for feedback too.
Attachment #706828 - Flags: feedback?(stefanh)
(In reply to Ian Neal from comment #12) > Comment on attachment 706828 [details] [diff] [review] > Patch for TB19 / SM2.16 > > Probably worth asking stefanh for feedback too. I was more thinking of the late l10n string perspective than the viability of the patch.
Comment on attachment 706828 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for TB19 / SM2.16 f+ for attachment #706829 [details] [diff] [review] too since it's the same patch ;-)
Attachment #706828 - Flags: feedback?(stefanh) → feedback+
Comment on attachment 706828 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for TB19 / SM2.16 r+ and a+ (though it is late) its had plenty of bake, I can't set a+ though in this component. :(
Attachment #706828 - Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek) → review+
Mark, can you rubber-stamp this for me (I know it has late-l10n, but I think its worth it given the growl re-add, for SeaMonkey) -- for TB theres no more betas anyway. I want this landed by the time the migrations start.
Flags: needinfo?(mbanner)
Attachment #706828 - Flags: approval-comm-beta? → approval-comm-beta+
Flags: needinfo?(mbanner)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: