Closed
Bug 859579
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Work - disable pdf.js in metro Firefox
Categories
(Firefox for Metro Graveyard :: Components, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 27
People
(Reporter: jimm, Assigned: rsilveira)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [leave closed])
Attachments
(1 file)
3.25 KB,
patch
|
mbrubeck
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
str:
- open a multipage pdf
- try to scroll the document
result: document doesn't scroll
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
We should drop PDF.js support on Metro until they're a better experience than the Reader app. I'll get a story for removing it.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: pdf.sj documents can't be scrolled via touch → pdf.js documents can't be scrolled via touch
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: pdf.js documents can't be scrolled via touch → Work - disable pdf.js in metro Firefox
![]() |
Reporter | |
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
This is still broken for touch. The work here should be pretty simple.
Whiteboard: [preview]
It should be disabled for all platforms. Just a short time on the web
show that it uses too much memory
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=878397
It prints incorrectly
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=880181
and fails to render many documents on the web
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=844472
In a university setting, with many users on medium power computers
the result of trying to view pdf files is a disaster on about 10%
of all files that need to be accessed which teaching a class using technical
documents
It is a way to generate a disastrous reputation for users of firefox
I should be turned on when it works for all but a tiny proportion of documents
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Disabling pdfjs.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #813201 -
Flags: review?(mbrubeck) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 27
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [preview]
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Asa Dotzler [:asa] from comment #1)
> We should drop PDF.js support on Metro until they're a better experience
> than the Reader app. I'll get a story for removing it.
Hi Asa,
Can I ask that in future we more of an effort to inform the PDF.js team about issues like this? This isn't filed against our PDF Viewer component, nor was mentioned in #pdf.js IRC or in our mailing list.
Our telemetry data for other platforms suggests that PDF.js is working well for the vast majority of documents, and we're having pretty good luck with touch devices on Firefox OS, so we'd like to work with the right people to get this reenabled.
thanks,
-Bill
![]() |
Reporter | |
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Bill Walker [:bwalker] [@wfwalker] from comment #8)
> (In reply to Asa Dotzler [:asa] from comment #1)
> > We should drop PDF.js support on Metro until they're a better experience
> > than the Reader app. I'll get a story for removing it.
>
> Hi Asa,
>
> Can I ask that in future we more of an effort to inform the PDF.js team
> about issues like this? This isn't filed against our PDF Viewer component,
> nor was mentioned in #pdf.js IRC or in our mailing list.
>
> Our telemetry data for other platforms suggests that PDF.js is working well
> for the vast majority of documents, and we're having pretty good luck with
> touch devices on Firefox OS, so we'd like to work with the right people to
> get this reenabled.
>
> thanks,
> -Bill
We can reopen bug 922323 and move it to the right component so we have something to keep track of.
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jim Mathies [:jimm] from comment #9)
> We can reopen bug 922323 and move it to the right component so we have
> something to keep track of.
Awesome, thanks Jim!
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Bill Walker [:bwalker] [@wfwalker] from comment #8)
> (In reply to Asa Dotzler [:asa] from comment #1)
> > We should drop PDF.js support on Metro until they're a better experience
> > than the Reader app. I'll get a story for removing it.
>
> Hi Asa,
>
> Can I ask that in future we more of an effort to inform the PDF.js team
> about issues like this? This isn't filed against our PDF Viewer component,
> nor was mentioned in #pdf.js IRC or in our mailing list.
>
> Our telemetry data for other platforms suggests that PDF.js is working well
> for the vast majority of documents, and we're having pretty good luck with
> touch devices on Firefox OS, so we'd like to work with the right people to
> get this reenabled.
>
> thanks,
> -Bill
Bill, back when I was still managing this product, I made the call that we should prefer the system viewer to our own built-in player. While I appreciate that PDF.js is making things a lot better for Firefox users, I'm not sure it's the right experience for Metro. Metro is a tablet experience where "apps" dominate, like on phones. People don't need or want a "everything including the kitchen sink" browser on Metro. They have apps that handle so much and in a way that's very user-choice friendly.
Having said that, this is Karen's baby now and I defer to her judgement on this.
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
I backed out the code removal parts of this patch but left the preference change in place:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/fx-team/rev/c8c8831321da
This means that PDF.js is still disabled in Metro by default, but developers and testers can now easily test it in nightly Metro builds by setting "pdfjs.disabled" to "false" in about:config.
Whiteboard: [leave closed]
Updated•11 years ago
|
OS: Windows 8 Metro → Windows 8.1
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•