Closed
Bug 963776
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Blocklist Advanced SystemCare Surfing Protection add-on
Categories
(Toolkit :: Blocklist Policy Requests, defect)
Toolkit
Blocklist Policy Requests
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
2014-11
People
(Reporter: kmag, Assigned: jorgev)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [qa-])
Installed by 'Advanced SystemCare' installer from iobit.com. Bypasses about:newaddon. Also installs IOBit Apps Toolbar (bug 948695), but that one does not bypass the opt-in screen.
ID: ascsurfingprotection@iobit.com
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Hah. I spoke too soon. I rebooted my VM and the apps toolbar was enabled and 2 additional add-ons were silently installed. Also the search engine was set to Yahoo! and I'm not prevented from changing it to anything else.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Looks like a Spigot add-on, like the IObit Apps Toolbar. Just contacted the developer about it.
Reporter | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Blocks: spigot-malware
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
This is still an issue.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → jorge
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [qa-]
Target Milestone: --- → 2014-11
I have FF 33.0 ("Release"), Aurora, and Nightly. I also has ASC Installed.
The URL "about:newaddon" does not work on this version of FF. I can try on later versions, later on today.
The "more" Link, obtained from the "about:addons" Page clearly identifies the Extension as "Advanced SystemCare Surfing Protection" and explains that it will "Protect your computer away from malicious website attack.". Also there is an URL to their Site.
When you install ASC you can choose to utilize this Feature or decide not to.
I am not opposed to this being blocked due to it bypassing an Opt-in Screen in Firefox. I do not think it should be made to look like it is a "Security Risk" when the Authors presumably hope that the Extension would aid to prevent such problems.
Sending them an Email to educate them about our expectations is good way to go but I think we need a "risk" or a proof of hostility, or lack of cooperation before a "Blacklisting". It may worry the enduser unneccesarily and there are many examples of other Plugins (like RealDownloader or DivX) from well know Companies that do the same thing without complaint (and those Plugins / Extensions are broken on later versions of FF).
I have used the ASC Extension for years and have not seen it crash or had problems with it. A couple of times in the last few years it denied me entry to a Website it thought was compromised or had some Exploit on the Page. That was likely helpful.
I will leave it enabled on my System and if I notice any problems I will report them in this Thread (now it is on my List of Threads commented in).
Thank you for going through the Extensions and Plugins to make sure they conform to Standards and work as expected.
FYI;
Discovered Hidden Add-on On Firefox. How To Check Yours
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/forums/support-forum-contributors/711335
Updated•9 years ago
|
Product: addons.mozilla.org → Toolkit
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•