Closed
Bug 170609
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
-remote openurl() opens Mozilla window if Mozilla is running
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Future
People
(Reporter: lawrenceteo, Assigned: bryner)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
15.62 KB,
patch
|
hyatt
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20020923 Phoenix/0.1
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20020923 Phoenix/0.1
If Mozilla and Phoenix are both running at the same time, using the "-remote
openurl()" command on Phoenix opens the Mozilla window instead of Phoenix.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start Mozilla.
2. Start Phoenix
3. At the commandline, cd to the phoenix install directory and type:
./phoenix -remote 'openurl(http://www.kuro5hin.org/)'
(or any other URL)
Actual Results:
The Mozilla window opens the URL.
Expected Results:
The Phoenix window should have opened the URL instead of Mozilla.
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
essentially (for the purposes of XRemote), Phoenix identifies itself as Mozilla.
And the Phoenix xremote-client looks for a version of Mozilla. It will grab a
Mozilla or Phoenix window, whichever one was used most recently. Mozilla will
also be perfectly happy to grab a Phoenix window.
The problem exists in:
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/widget/src/gtk/nsGtkMozRemoteHelper.cpp#33
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/widget/src/gtk/nsGtkMozRemoteHelper.cpp#57
and then here:
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/widget/src/xremoteclient/XRemoteClient.cpp#41
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/widget/src/xremoteclient/XRemoteClient.cpp#196
not knowing how Phoenix is built, I have NO idea how (or if) this can be
remedied within Phoenix.
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
setting status to new. bryner, can you help us here.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 173314 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 173806 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
this bug is going to screw things up for people using Mozilla RPMs (and Phoenix
RPMs if they ever exist)
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
doing #ifdef MOZ_PHOENIX to redefine MOZILLA_VERSION_PROP in
nsGtkMozRemoteHelper.cpp and XRemoteClient.cpp is sufficient to fix this bug.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
We should make this generic and use the product name defined in the nsXREAppData.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 102745 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
r=hyatt
Attachment #102745 -
Flags: review+
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
Am I reading this right? Would this change the atoms to PHOENIX_VERSION, etc?
This will break an incredible number of existing clients and is completely
unacceptable.
The correct way to do this is to use the version in the _MOZILLA_VERSION atom
and match against it. I guess we can do something like 5.0/phonix or
5.0/mozilla if you want. But we should not be changing these atom names since
this protocol has been around for a very, very long time.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
But that's actually what we want to do. We don't want phoenix and mozilla
xremote to interfere with each other. They are two totally separate apps.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
Also, if there are external programs that use the X atoms directly, instead of
just calling "mozilla -remote", we would have to contend with these apps not
matching the version string correctly until they are updated.
If the vast majority of apps use "mozilla -remote" for xremote functionality
then we can pretty much do whatever we'd like, including putting the product
name in the version string, if you like that better.
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
There are lots of apps out there that use the protocol directly, some that use
mozilla -remote and some that still use netscape -remote. I don't want to see
any of them broken. Phonix should work with them as well.
We can solve this for mozilla -remote (which I think should search for mozilla
first and then fall back to anything else it finds) and phoenix -remote. The
real solution here is to fix the client side code to be much smarter.
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 175069 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
so is the patch here obsolete? can someone mark it so if it is? thanks.
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
Should openURL also differentiate between profiles? I've been using Phoenix 0.5
with a "default" and a "work" profile. It would be nice if one could do
phoenix -P default -remote 'openURL(http://mozilla.org)'
and
phoenix -P work -remote 'openURL(http://mozilla.org)'
And have the correct thing happen. Currently, whichever browser+profile was
opened first responds.
Comment 18•22 years ago
|
||
See bug 87893.
Comment 19•22 years ago
|
||
huh? that bug is about mail filters
Comment 20•22 years ago
|
||
I'm wondering (out loud) about how the changes in the Mozilla "suite" will
effect this bug. Now that Firebird will be incorporated as the primary broswer
application in the traditional Mozilla package, will this bug go away naturally
since there won't be multiple browsers fighting to fulfill the request?
If not, what are the chances of a Milestone being set? I'm thinking this would
be good to complete prior to the merging of Firebird into the suite. If not, it
seems that the merge would actually be breaking functionality that currently works.
Not being a programmer, I'm not sure if/how I can help other than testing. Hope
that's enough!
Comment 21•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 207453 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22•22 years ago
|
||
From bug #207453: this impacts also if you'd like to run Moz.Firebird &
Thunderbird in parallel.
Updated•22 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → After Firebird 1.0
Comment 23•22 years ago
|
||
In case this needs pointing out, Firebird may run just fine in spite of this bug in most circumstances, and Thunderbird too, but if users plan to use both, it's a big problem.
Since I now use Mozilla for both browsing & e-mail, I am stuck using Mozilla instead of Firebird/Thunderbird until either this bug is fixed or I find a different mail program. I hope that didn't come across as antagonistic (did not mean it that way). I just want to point out that while this may not be a blocker for either individual component, for me it's a blocker for using the componentized Mozilla bits at all.
Comment 24•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 214503 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 25•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 214683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26•21 years ago
|
||
I'm getting further reports that pages are being loaded into Thunderbird due to
this bug. That is a Bad Thing, and is probably worth Firebird 1.0.
Updated•21 years ago
|
QA Contact: asa
Comment 27•21 years ago
|
||
To answer Asa's question in comment 16, the patch no longer applies cleanly to
the CVS trunk. My naive/trivial attempts to clean up the rejected blocks lead
to code that won't link, so I can't attach a newer patch.
On a related note, the patch only distinguishes between Mozilla and Firebird; it
should probably take Thunderbird into account as well, although (I believe) a
Mozilla/Thunderbird combination is less likely to occur.
Comments 22, 23 and especially 26 seem to indicate a pre-1.0 target might be
appropriate.
Comment 28•21 years ago
|
||
Maybe it's just me, but this seems like a pretty serious bug. It effectively
prevents anyone from using thunderbird and firebird at the same time. If the
monolithic Mozilla is deprecated, this is a bad thing. (It also effectively
prevents people from testing these apps since they can't easily be used for
normal day-to-day activities). See also:
bug 217752
bug 226333 (but bug 226333, comment 1 suggests this is noted in the release
notes, but I couldn't find it)
bug 226777
bug 226780
bug 227486
bug 227658
bug 229021
And last but not least bug 177996 (in particular, bug 177996, comment 26 and up)
Comment 29•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 228631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 30•21 years ago
|
||
Does anyone know of a work-around for this bug? I just downloaded Firefox, and
I've found that I can't use it. I use the integrated Mozilla for email, so in
order to open a web browser I have to close down my email. I wondered if
switching to Thunderbird for email would help, but if I'm reading the comments
correctly, it won't. It will be a sad day if I have to switch to Evolution...
If there is no easy work-around, might I suggest that this bug be redesignated
as a blocker for any future Firefox release? Firefox is virtually unusable on
Linux until it is fixed.
Please don't read this comment as a flame, it's not meant that way. It's only
because I'm excited about Firefox that I am motivated to provide feedback. I
love the browser and I'm frustrated that I can't use it. :-)
Comment 31•21 years ago
|
||
The workaround I use (thanks to bug 227486 comment 4) is to write wrapper
scripts that export a unique LOGNAME environment variable for each app (such as
$USER+mozilla, $USER+firefox, $USER+thunderbird), call mozilla-xremote-client
with an appropriate command, and launch the app if that fails. You have to be
careful that the wrong LOGNAME doesn't bleed through when one app calls another.
This hack won't work if you use any apps that directly call
mozilla-xremote-client or use the xremote protocol.
Obvously, a user shouldn't have to do that. I know the Mozilla team has put a
lot of effort into producing a great browser and mail client for Linux, so it's
a shame that one problem like this makes them almost unusable. If the apps can't
be fixed any time soon, they really need to be shipped with a script along those
lines that makes them Just Work.
Flags: blocking0.9?
Comment 32•21 years ago
|
||
Target is After Firefox 1.0, so blocking0.9-.
Flags: blocking0.9? → blocking0.9-
Comment 33•21 years ago
|
||
fixed by bug 237283
removing bogus dependency
Comment 34•21 years ago
|
||
The latest Fedora RPM seems to fix this bug for me. Many thanks.
Comment 35•21 years ago
|
||
Not sure if this is the same bug or not, but when I installed Firefox from Dag
Wieers' yum repo, whether Mozilla was running or not, running "firefox" from the
commandline and using the menu item both opened Mozilla until I removed it from
my system.
Comment 36•21 years ago
|
||
It sounds like the same bug. Try the Firefox package from the Fedora extras,
that fixed the problem for me.
Comment 37•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 233576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Depends on: 1706092
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•