Closed
Bug 635830
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Re-implement locale filter
Categories
(addons.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Public Pages, defect)
addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
Public Pages
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
Q1 2012
People
(Reporter: kohei, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
6.50 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
From nnguyen's to do list:
https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0Ad7mAOXgEBZyZGRzNnZ3YjRfOHRyOXptNGdz
By default, users should only see content that has a translation for their own specific locale. Localizers can add or remove content to this view.
We've identified a need in several markets (particularly where English is not generally understood) for the ability to filter AMO for specific locales. For instance, in JA, there should be a checkbox (checked by default but remembered on a per browser basis) that filters all search, collection, and listing content by whether or not they contain JA specific translations.
-----
And fligtar's comment in Bug 505077:
We added support for the first item (being able to filter out add-ons not in
your locale) in bug 532016 last year, but removed it 6 months later because of
a number of issues with it. We need to figure out a better way to surface and
design the feature.
-----
The Chrome Extensions gallery has a drop down menu to filter locale:
https://chrome.google.com/extensions?hl=ja&itemlang=ja
https://chrome.google.com/extensions?hl=fr&itemlang=fr
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Summary: Add Locale Filter → Re-implement locale filter
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
-> Jeff to evaluate how much work this will be. It's my understanding that it should be possible with ES's facets a lot easier than what we did in the past
Assignee: nobody → jbalogh
Target Milestone: --- → Q1 2012
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
1. How do we judge the translated-ness of an addon? If it has -ja strings for summary and description in our db, or if it has -ja strings in the xpi?
2. How are we exposing this in the UI?
I think it would be a day of plumbing + testing to hook this up, depending on the difficulty of determining whether an add-on is translated.
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jeff Balogh (:jbalogh) from comment #3)
> 1. How do we judge the translated-ness of an addon? If it has -ja strings
> for summary and description in our db, or if it has -ja strings in the xpi?
The translation in the addon itself is a necessary, I would think, but you might want to also require description translation at the same time. That being said, in my experience getting full translations of long descriptions is much harder than getting the addon itself done. (even if there's more to do in the addon) I would suggest considering the minimum to be a translated addon plus a translated short description (summary), but not necessarily a long description. This would ensure consistent readability in all category, collection, and search pages, but still allow for addons that don't have portions of their individual public pages translated.
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: jbalogh → nobody
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
I do not understand how to fix this issue completely, but am convinced that this patch makes some improvements about this issue.
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
Ooops! That patch was wrong one.
Attachment #580823 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
Thanks for filing this. Due to resource constraints we are closing bugs which we won't realistically be able to fix. If you have a patch that applies to this bug please reopen.
For more info see http://micropipes.com/blog/2014/09/24/the-great-add-on-bug-triage/
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•