Tracking what's going in to the next one.
So far: 3ad57f4 Bug 718703 - Pair a Device crashes. r=rnewman 3c530d1 Bug 709660 - Fixed blurry icons used in SyncAdapter. r=rnewman bde287a Bug 719693 - Compatibility for JDK < 6. 91c5e23 Bug 719693 - Effect review comments on 6ffb7d72f. 6ffb7d7 Bug 719693 - Handle date-format HTTP Retry-After headers. 6df289e Bug 709348 - Trace logging and fixed logging of visit equality. 71580df Bug 709348 - Include Fennec visits and counts in HistoryRecord androidID equivalence. 8f6a106 Bug 709348 - Equality work. f40bf4a Bug 709348 - Part 5: Rework handling of certain cases of incoming deletion, including history visits. 0dd004d Bug 709348 - Part 4: Reworking equality tests between records. 2210717 Bug 709348 - Part 3: Better commenting for ignored bookmark records. c05236b Bug 709348 - Part 2: Introduce trace log method. a34f4aa Bug 709348 - Part 1: Introduce copyWithIDs to clone records. 796b15f Bug 721305 - sync.link.advancedsetup.label should use …, not .... adf7586 Bump AndroidSync User-Agent version. I will land at the same time (pending review, of course): Bug 718703 - Part 0: Makefile fix for preprocessing multiple files. r=ted Bug 722896. Bug 718703 - Part 1: Sync crashes from Pair a Device link in sync settings. r=rnewman Bug 718703 - Part 2: Makefile change to preprocess sync_options.xml. r=ted I have a try build of these things: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=0e2d59ecbaf8 I will bump the rest of Bug 709348, and anything else left over, to the next drop.
Bug 722434 - check for failure after JSON parsing. r=rnewman Bug 722426: Remove WRITE_SECURE_SETTINGS from the Android manifest, since this permission is only granted to system/firmware applications. r=rnewman Bug 722896. r=dchan Bug 722430: Propagate NoSuchAlgorithmException and InvalidKeyException; wrap in CryptoException higher up the call stack. r=rnewman
Try run for 9569e93be612 is complete. Detailed breakdown of the results available here: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=9569e93be612 Results (out of 131 total builds): exception: 30 success: 67 warnings: 16 failure: 1 other: 17 Builds (or logs if builds failed) available at: http://email@example.com
Try run for 943421074305 is complete. Detailed breakdown of the results available here: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=943421074305 Results (out of 271 total builds): exception: 2 success: 239 warnings: 29 failure: 1 Builds (or logs if builds failed) available at: http://firstname.lastname@example.org
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/34c03a42a465 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b9b8107bb91f https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/fad9c50ab47d https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/50dfa77287fc https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/4b1a491ad571 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/2b49a406570b https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e3427fb08d16 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5a918bbf0cd6 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/dab232f3a4f3 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8d922468a7fe https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/2ce9638b93e2
Created attachment 594284 [details] [diff] [review] Approval coathook. Hanging m-a and m-b approval on this. Some of the bugs that landed at the same time (particularly the ones that touched Makefiles, and thus didn't flow with everything else) have independent flags. akeybl, please let me know if you have any questions.
I have updated blassey's Aurora patch queue: http://hg.mozilla.org/users/blassey_mozilla.com/patches-needed-on-aurora The Beta patch queue is currently busted, so I haven't updated that yet.
> The Beta patch queue is currently busted, so I haven't updated that yet. I commented out the patches that were labeled in the series as failing to apply, and imported all of mine. Good to go.
This is on my radar, but we should probably wait to have it on m-c for a day before pushing to Aurora/Beta.
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #10) > This is on my radar, but we should probably wait to have it on m-c for a day > before pushing to Aurora/Beta. Yup, and tchung and crew are testing this afternoon.
Comment on attachment 594284 [details] [diff] [review] Approval coathook. [Triage Comment] Approved for Aurora 12 and Beta 11.
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/e6022b12e254 https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/6aa8343c3b4a https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/99eca3dd8a7c https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/d6581d4115cf https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/43ee85dffc7b https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/769552280aa4 https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/600a1f879378 https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/b07aec0d378b https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/4f769f1fcf82 https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/badab638e09d https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/13d4e59381f6 https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/64d39b99f7a4
calling this verified per depends bugs. But what about the crypto meta bug 722485
(In reply to Tracy Walker [:tracy] from comment #14) > calling this verified per depends bugs. > > But what about the crypto meta bug 722485 Nearly done… and mostly [qa-], too.
Looks to already have landed on beta as well: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/pushloghtml?changeset=088774d5dd19