Closed
Bug 823508
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Indicate progress state when setting Call Forwarding
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Settings, defect)
Tracking
(blocking-b2g:tef+, b2g18+ verified, b2g18-v1.0.1 verified)
VERIFIED
FIXED
blocking-b2g | tef+ |
People
(Reporter: dscravaglieri, Assigned: jaoo)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: IOT, Chile, Ikura, khepera_43949)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
As a secondary priority, in Call Forwarding, we should also indicate progress state when a setting is toggled since these types of network features take time to set.
Split of bug 823506
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-basecamp: --- → ?
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-basecamp: ? → -
Updated•12 years ago
|
tracking-b2g18:
--- → +
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → josea.olivera
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-basecamp: - → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Kaze, this PR is about showing some info after setting up call forwarding. Right now there is no feedback at all. Here we also deal with an important issue which is the operator might not support disabling call forwarding for some reasons such as 'mobile busy', unanswered and 'no reachable'. In that case we show the corresponding alert to the user.
Attachment #705120 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #706999 -
Flags: review?(kaze)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 706999 [details]
Pointer to Github PR: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/7819
Vivien, Kaze is PTO. Could you take a look at this PR please?. See comment #2 for more information. Thx!
Attachment #706999 -
Flags: review?(kaze) → review?(21)
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 706999 [details]
Pointer to Github PR: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/7819
Kaze will be back on monday so hopefully this bug will finally be reviewed!
Attachment #706999 -
Flags: review?(21) → review?(kaze)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 706999 [details]
Pointer to Github PR: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/7819
Arthur, this PR is about showing some info after setting up call forwarding. Right now there is no feedback at all. Here we also deal with an important issue which is the operator might not support disabling call forwarding for some reasons such as 'mobile busy', unanswered and 'no reachable'. In that case we show the corresponding alert to the user. I'm requesting review at you since you're so familiar with CF code ;).
Attachment #706999 -
Flags: review?(kaze) → review?(arthur.chen)
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
There is an extra call to 'getCallForwardingOption' with this change. In 'updateCallForwardingSubpanels' we can also get the needed information. Is it possible to do the check and display alerts in that function? Then we can save one lengthy function call.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Arthur Chen [:arthurcc] from comment #6)
> There is an extra call to 'getCallForwardingOption' with this change. In
> 'updateCallForwardingSubpanels' we can also get the needed information. Is
> it possible to do the check and display alerts in that function? Then we can
> save one lengthy function call.
Good suggestion. Done, take a look again please? Thx!
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 706999 [details]
Pointer to Github PR: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/7819
r=me. Thanks for the work!
Attachment #706999 -
Flags: review?(arthur.chen) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Noming for tef+, it blocks bug 857691.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: --- → tef?
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: tef? → tef+
Updated•12 years ago
|
status-b2g18:
--- → affected
status-b2g18-v1.0.1:
--- → affected
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
This bug was partially uplifted.
Uplifted 8bff7dfcfcdd7165c605c98c70cf69d5cc8828d2 to:
v1-train: 34531cbc88eaee06aa57878669a074fee84632e0
Commit 8bff7dfcfcdd7165c605c98c70cf69d5cc8828d2 didn't uplift to branch v1.0.1
Updated•12 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(josea.olivera)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
James, I'll uplift this bug once all the dependencies reach the corresponding branches/release repos. James, I'll contact you in case of I need help. Thanks a lot for your support in previous upliftings.
Flags: needinfo?(josea.olivera)
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
v1.0.1: 052253176f3ad495a1086e47a28fffbf07613388
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Verified fixed on Unagi Build ID: 20130430070204
Environmental Variables:
Kernel Date: Dec 5
Gecko: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g18/rev/8ca8149ce236
Gaia: b525c25063d33d2e073d9f3e1e1164fadefec998
Also verified fixed on Inari Build ID: 20130430070201
Environmental Variables:
Kernel Date: Feb 21
Gecko: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g18_v1_0_1/rev/010498e599a7
Gaia: de0f1fc6c58616b8a33fca482f1f8684d4e74e9e
Call forwarding can be enabled.
Comment 16•11 years ago
|
||
Khepera_43949 depends on this bug, but is no longer blocked.
Whiteboard: IOT, Chile, Ikura, khepera_43949
Comment 17•11 years ago
|
||
I got a question from a localizer, and I don't have an answer:
What does "Operation successfully set" mean. Is that just "Operation succeeded"?
Should we have a bug on a better wording then?
Comment 18•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #17)
> What does "Operation successfully set" mean. Is that just "Operation
> succeeded"?
Maybe "Option successfully set", but I translated it exactly as "Operation succeeded". I guess a better wording would help.
Comment 19•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Francesco Lodolo [:flod] from comment #18)
>
> Maybe "Option successfully set", but I translated it exactly as "Operation
> succeeded". I guess a better wording would help.
Thanks Francesco, that makes more sense. Can we be more specific in the translation (and probably in the en-US original)? Since it's an indicator if the Call Forwarding operation did it's job, is "Call was forwarded successfully" adequate for positive feedback and analogously for the negative?
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #17)
> I got a question from a localizer, and I don't have an answer:
>
> What does "Operation successfully set" mean. Is that just "Operation
> succeeded"?
Yes, it is.
> Should we have a bug on a better wording then?
"Operation succeeded" sounds fine IHMO.
Comment 21•11 years ago
|
||
Filed bug 893793.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•