Closed
Bug 1158595
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
[user story 1C] As a user, I'd like to read an article in small, self-sustaining chunks
Categories
(support.mozilla.org :: Knowledge Base Software, task, P2)
support.mozilla.org
Knowledge Base Software
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
2015Q2
People
(Reporter: atopal, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: u=user c=wiki p=1 s=2015.8)
User Story
As a user, I'd like to read an article in small, self-sustaining chunks, so I'm not overwhelmed by the mass of content on a page, especially on mobile. Acceptance Criteria: *Every article that has a table of contents has its content collapsed under headers * The collapsing function works exactly as the experiment we have been running. That is: ** This replaces the table of contents, the article page does not list a separate TOC ** Clicking on a header expands the section below it. ** Clicking another header does not collapse the previously expanded section ** Only the highest level is collapsed, all sub-sections are expanded when the highest level is expanded.
This was estimated as 1 pt, since we are already doing this selectively for certain articles. The latest UX is attached to the meta bug (bug 1158591)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → mcooper
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
PR: https://github.com/mozilla/kitsune/pull/2501/files
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Ricky merged this in: https://github.com/mozilla/kitsune/commit/130d08ab0930aeadb133918f35ffa17d0eb122dc I deployed this to prod.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
It has become clear that this feature isn't ready yet. I was under the impression that because this had been in testing on a small number of articles prior to a full roll out that we had run through problematiic articles and gotten community support. That isn't true. This feature needs more work. I've filed this PR to revert these changes: https://github.com/mozilla/kitsune/pull/2527
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
do we still want this? if not we should close this bug!
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: mcooper → nobody
This needs more research to prove that we really need it. If we do need it, we can just write shorter articles rather than relying on a new design.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago → 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•