Closed
Bug 1236014
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Pocket as a built-in add-on not supported by language packs, manifest problems
Categories
(Firefox :: Pocket, defect)
Firefox
Pocket
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 46
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox46 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: Pike, Assigned: mixedpuppy)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 1 obsolete file)
bug 1215694 comment 106:
I'm pretty sure this breaks in language packs.
Seems there's nothing hooking up browser/features/firefox@getpocket.com/chrome.manifest.
Fuchsia:locale-fr axelhecht$ find . -name \*manif\*
./browser/chrome/fr.manifest
./browser/chrome.manifest
./browser/features/chrome.manifest
./browser/features/firefox@getpocket.com/chrome.manifest
./browser/features/firefox@getpocket.com/fr.manifest
./chrome/fr.manifest
./chrome.manifest
./webapprt/chrome/fr.manifest
./webapprt/chrome.manifest
Fuchsia:locale-fr axelhecht$ find . -name \*manif\* -exec grep -H getpocket {} \;
./browser/features/chrome.manifest:manifest firefox@getpocket.com/chrome.manifest application={ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}
I haven't run a localized nightly yet that actually has their locale files moved, but the chrome.manifest in /Applications/FirefoxNightly.app/Contents/Resources/browser/features/firefox@getpocket.com.xpi looks OK to me.
bug 1215694 comment 110:
Ah, that's because jarmaker puts the extra manifest in browser/features... and that one is not referenced anywhere. Please file a followup bug. A quick way around is to forcefully add a "manifest features/chrome.manifest" in "browser/chrome.manifest", using buildlist.py, when doing a repack.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
none of these are related to l10n, there is no reason to block on them.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
I tried a build and am not sure a) got the correct build instructions, and b) what problem I'm expecting to run into.
Built DE, it has other missing files on nightly
Built FR, it seems to work just fine
I'm building by modifying .mozconfig with:
mk_add_options MOZ_CO_LOCALES=fr
ac_add_options --enable-ui-locale=fr
ac_add_options --with-l10n-base=/Users/shanec/moz/l10n/
But get: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-ui-locale, --with-l10n-base
This also causes a clobber so this takes a long time, is there a simpler repack method?
Flags: needinfo?(mh+mozilla)
Flags: needinfo?(l10n)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Creating_a_Language_Pack is the best doc. Best in the sense of "not perfect"
Sadly, I don't think there's a way to avoid the reconfig.
There's no MOC_CO_LOCALES, that probably died with CVS.
--enable-ui-locale may or may not work, but it's really left-over from pre-Firefox days that we should get rid of some day, I think.
Note, you don't want to do a build, you want to create a language pack, and install that in an en-US build, and then French should not work, despite it working in a full build.
Flags: needinfo?(mh+mozilla)
Flags: needinfo?(l10n)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
I seem to be able to build a working fr langpack on nightly. I'm not certain what I'm missing. One thing I notice as a difference in docs you pointed to is that the xpi does not show up under dist/install, but under dist/mac64/xpi.
For my testing I am doing the following
obj/browser/locales:
make merge-it LOCALE_MERGEDIR=$(PWD)/mergedir
make langpack-it LOCALE_MERGEDIR=$(PWD)/mergedir
mach run
then install the xpi from obj/dist/mac64/xpi
Everything seems to work just fine, though strings of course are not translated.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
oh, using locale switcher addon to change to the locale, which then requires a restart.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
For mozilla-central of revision 29258f59e545 and l10n-central/it of revision 6ef2139979dc, which maps to nightly of 46.0a1 (2016-01-05), I do:
.mozconfig:
mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=@TOPSRCDIR@/obj-firefox-build
ac_add_options --with-l10n-base=/src/central/l10n-central/
ac_add_options --enable-application=browser
ac_add_options --with-macbundlename-prefix=Firefox
./mach configure
cd obj-firefox-build/browser/locales
make langpack-it
You probably need to
./mach build config
and kill that at some point, to get nsinstall built.
Then open the file in dist/mac64/xpi, open about:config, set general.useragent.locale to it, restart.
Then I get the pocket UI in English, though it's localized.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
The problem I am seeing is that pocket specific strings, such as context menu, are not translated.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Ok, got this now. full builds are fine, but the manifests in the xpi's are not correct, so the pocket strings are not showing up translated.
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Here's the pocket UI I do see translated into Italian when using the Italian Nightly, but not when using the Italian language pack.
That the context menu don't show up a localized string is that it's actually in English in the localized file. Tsktsktsk, flod.
http://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/it/rev/6000f0fa38a4#l4.40
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #9)
> in English in the localized file. Tsktsktsk, flod.
> http://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/it/rev/6000f0fa38a4#l4.40
Fudge! Copying and pasting strings around does that.
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Francesco Lodolo [:flod] from comment #10)
> (In reply to Axel Hecht [:Pike] from comment #9)
> > in English in the localized file. Tsktsktsk, flod.
> > http://hg.mozilla.org/l10n-central/it/rev/6000f0fa38a4#l4.40
>
> Fudge! Copying and pasting strings around does that.
Are there no automated tests for non-en-* locales having identical strings to the source strings? Could even make a commit/push hook. We're all humans and make mistakes, but automation could help us here. Probably a different bug though...
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Gijs Kruitbosch from comment #11)
> Are there no automated tests for non-en-* locales having identical strings
> to the source strings?
That's not possible. Think about Dutch and the amount of terms shared with English (or en-GB), plenty of English strings that belong to a localization.
These are all valid for Italian
https://transvision.mozfr.org/unchanged/?locale=it&repo=central
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
I can make a language pack that works with this. Not sure it is "correct".
Assignee: nobody → mixedpuppy
Attachment #8706656 -
Flags: review?(mh+mozilla)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8706656 -
Attachment is patch: true
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8706656 [details] [diff] [review]
make sure browser/features/chrome.manifest is registered
Review of attachment 8706656 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: browser/extensions/pocket/locales/jar.mn
@@ +6,5 @@
> [features/firefox@getpocket.com] @AB_CD@.jar:
> % locale pocket @AB_CD@ %locale/@AB_CD@/
> locale/@AB_CD@/ (%*)
> +
> +# Bug 1236014, make sure l10n repacks work with feature addons
I'd feel better about such a hack if it were limited to #ifdef XPI_NAME
Attachment #8706656 -
Flags: review?(mh+mozilla) → feedback+
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
I think it also makes more sense for this to be in a jar that does not belong to an addon. Moving it to browser/locale/jar.mn will allow for evolution of what is in the features addons without possible breakage.
Attachment #8706656 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8708052 -
Flags: review?(mh+mozilla)
Comment 16•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8708052 [details] [diff] [review]
l10repack
Review of attachment 8708052 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: browser/locales/jar.mn
@@ +113,5 @@
> locale/pdfviewer/chrome.properties (%pdfviewer/chrome.properties)
> +
> +#ifdef XPI_NAME
> +# Bug 1236014, make sure l10n repacks work with feature addons
> +# kind of hacky, but ensures the chrome.manifest chain is complete
s/kind of/Completely/ :)
Could you file a separate bug to fix it in a non-hacky way and mention the number of /that/ bug instead of this one? Even if we don't fix it in the short term, it's better to have an open bug and a reference to it.
Attachment #8708052 -
Flags: review?(mh+mozilla) → review+
Comment 18•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 46
Comment 19•9 years ago
|
||
[bugday-20160323]
Status: RESOLVED,FIXED -> UNVERIFIED
Comments:
STR: Not clear.
Developer specific testing
Component:
Name Firefox
Version 46.0b9
Build ID 20160322075646
Update Channel beta
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:46.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/46.0
OS Windows 7 SP1 x86_64
Expected Results:
Developer specific testing
Actual Results:
As expected
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•