The goal here is to solve a bunch of bugs and make the console service easier to use in the process by making callers not have to deal with intl directly. The proposed changes are as follows: Allow callers to just pass to the console sevice the following information in a single function call: 1) [wstring] Module logging the message 2) [wstring] Message ID 3) [array_of(wstring)] Array of message-specific info strings 4) [long] Length of said array 5) [wstring] URL of thing triggering the error (eg script) 6) [wstring] Actual source text that led to the error 7) [unsigned long] Line number 8) [unsigned long] Column number 9) flags (though maybe we can eliminate this?) 10) Document object associated with the error (possibly null). The plan is that the console service will use items 1-4 to construct the actual error text (item 1 determines the stringbundle to use, item 2 determines the string in that bundle, then make intl do some work). This means callers don't need to depend on intl. Item 10 will be used in two ways: A) Get the document's docshell (if any) and walk up the same-type docshell tree till it gets to its root (the content area), then will get the url of the document loaded there and associate it with the error (this makes reloading and framesets happy while allowing easy location of the errors that apply to the "window from which you opened JS console"). B) If item #5 matches the URI of the document in item #10, the document's docshell, if it exists, will be QIed to nsIWebPageDescriptor and the current descriptor will be associated with the error (make view source happy for POST pages). What the console service will do with all that info is to create an nsIConsoleMessage (which will look a hell of a lot like what nsIScriptError looks like right now). In addition to what nsIScriptError has now, the console message, at creation time, will remember the timestamp. This nsIConsoleMessage will be dispatched to console service listeners, who all currently handle nsIScriptErrors with missing info anyway, so should be easily changeable to handle this. nsIScriptError will probably be eliminated. In addition to the above, there will be a method on the console service that takes a nsIConsoleMessage param (created somehow somewhere). This can be used by people who somehow want/need to subclass nsIConsoleMessage. There will no longer be a logStringError message. Callers will log an error as above with 0 or null for most of the fields (but non-null module and message id). A "clear()" method will be added to the console service that clears its current set of stored messages. Then we can remove the evil JS console hack. The only really problematic thing here is item 10 in the argument list. Currently the console service is in XPCOM, and it can't depend on things like nsIDOMDocument (for scriptability), nsIDocument, nsIDocShell, etc. The proposal is to leave the IDL where it is (so XPConnect can still use it), make that param an nsISupports documented to be a document object, and move the implementation out into embedding/components where it can depend on all this garbage. brendan, what do you think?
> 5) [wstring] URL of thing triggering the error (eg script) maybe nsIURI? a |wstring| looses the charset information. oh... this is xpcom...
13 years ago
13 years ago
bz: Would it be reasonable to add the error's stack property to that list? See bug 125612.
Maybe.... This is about errors in general, not just JS errors. So most of them will not have a stack property. For that matter, is the stack on Error() objects a JS-only thing? Or can it be reflected into C++ somehow? (I suspect the former.)
:) See bug 229824.
That's still talking about JS-only objects. Once there is a reasonable API that lets me pass these stack traces around in C++, we can add them to nsIConsoleService.
Is there a reason why this interface has to live in XPCOM? It doesn't look like XPCOM itself uses the interface for anything (though I can imagine the component manager/loader probably should). If not, can't we push the entire interface+impl into embedding/components, which is tier_9 and solves all the dependencies. We're gonna need something like this so that the ffox extension manager can report meaningful errors in a non-synchronous way... unless somebody else wants to step up to the plate, I'm gonna hack together a not-quite-perfect solution very soon. I also question the need for 6-7-8: can't we just make those part of 2?
Can xpconnect usefully depend on embedding/components?
What do you mean by making 6-7-8 part of 2? 2 is an identifier for the type of error (data that can be used to look up the error message to report or whatever). 6-7-8 are information about the circumstances in which the error occured (for display by the JS console, for example). I see no relationship...
> Is there a reason why this interface has to live in XPCOM? So XPConnect can depend on it, as bz said in comment 0. No, I don't think we want XPConnect to depend on later tiers. We've had bugs already where we've had to ifdef it bogusly. Still, XPCOM is only one place we could put it that satisfies all dependencies. We could also put it in XPConnect, I suppose, but it ought to be independent of JS some day (soon, if Python integration for XUL proceeds well). Doug should comment on putting an abstracted nsIConsoleService.idl, but no impl, in XPCOM. There may be another equally low tier we can put the .idl file under -- thoughts? /be
(In reply to comment #9) > There may be another equally low tier we can put the .idl file under -- thoughts? 'fraid not unless you're going to create a new one. js & xpcom live in tier_2 and xpconnect is the first thing built after that...in tier_9.
Ok, how about xpcom/io/nsIConsoleService.idl? xpcom/io already hosts interfaces not implemented in XPCOM, but used by XPCOM. It's legit to have a more primitive library expose a "callback" or set of callbacks. Doug, what do you say? /be
xpcom/io is fine for the nsIConsoleService IDL. As you mentioned in comment #9, the implementation should live else where.
Maybe nsIStackFrame would be useful here? Oh, and for #10, in stead of a document object, how about just an nsISupports argument just as a general error context, or what not? All errors may not always be related to a document...
We could make it a general context, but in the end we want to be able to get the document URI and the docshell from the context thing, whatever it is... nsIStackFrame would work to encapsulate some of the args if we want that sort of thing, yes.
(In reply to comment #14) > We could make it a general context, but in the end we want to be able to get the > document URI and the docshell from the context thing, whatever it is... then make it an interface requestor and document what people should be prepared to return?
Getting an interface requestor off a document is tough and a lot of work for some of the callers. I'd rather do nsISupports and say what it should be prepared to QI to.
Yeah, say that it's either a nsIDOMNode or an nsIInterfaceRequestor, or something along those lines...
13 years ago
Can we also add an nsIStackFrame argument to nsIConsoleService? That way, it would be possible to show a stack trace for the error leading to the console message.
Fixing this bug would be a huge help to the FireBug extension (https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=1843&application=firefox). The goal of the extension is to show the errors that derive from each window/tab in a separate console that is in a panel at the bottom of the browser window. Since nsIScriptError does not report the document that the error came from, FireBug's error reporting is not always accurate. The best I can do is append errors to the console that is currently visible, assuming it is most probable that errors will come from the document you are looking at.
I would also vote to fix this bug, I started using the extension mentioned in comment 19, it's very useful, unfortunately this bug causes it to report wrong error count for windows out of focus.
I'm not going to be working on this any time in the near future. It'd be nice to have for 1.9, but I doubt I'll manage it. If someone wants to take this and implement per the plan, that would be great.
11 years ago
SeaMonkey::Error Console->Toolkit::Error Console On trunk we use the toolkit error console.
To re-iterate and amplify Joe's comment 19, a central challenge for dev tools is the mismatch between how developers think and how the consoleService responds. Almost all development work is related to a window, except perhaps the lowest platform layers that start before the first window. So almost all errors start in some window, get thrown into nsIConsoleService without a window ref, then land in a place where the developer needs to figure out which window the error came from. Firebug works hard to reconstruct the information that the error source already has. In addition to getting it wrong sometimes, this also a significant performance hit since lots of sites are pumping lots of errors via ajax on to pages Firebug users aren't even debugging.
Comment 22: thanks for taking this out of my bug list. Was there a reason you did that? Comment 23: That's what this bug is largely about, yes.
8 years ago
Cross referencing bug reports: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=1572
Another cross referencing: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=1213
The Error Console has been removed in favor of the Browser Console (see Bug 1278368), and the component is going to be removed. If this bug is also relevant in the Browser Console, please reopen and move this into Firefox -> Developer Tools: Console.
I am mass-reopening and re-componenting every single one of the Toolkit:Error Console bugs that appear to have been closed without anyone even *glancing* at whether they were relevant to the Browser Console. If you want to close a whole bunch of old bugs -- FOR ANY REASON -- it is YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to check EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM and make sure they are no longer valid. Do not push that work onto the bug reporters. (It's okay to close bugs that haven't been touched in years when they don't have enough information for you to figure out whether the problem is still relevant to the current software - the reporter probably isn't coming back to clarify. But that is the ONLY situation where it is okay.) (I'm going to have to do this in two steps because of the way the "change several bugs at once" form works. Apologies for the extra bugspam.)
Setting reminder to ask Boris if this bug should remain opened once he's accepting requests.
Discussed on irc and sounds like this is still a relevant bug, although we might want to revisit the proposed API before making any changes