Add a right click context menu to History menu
Categories
(Firefox :: Bookmarks & History, enhancement)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: mmortal03, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Updated•20 years ago
|
Updated•20 years ago
|
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
Comment 8•18 years ago
|
||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Comment 9•18 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•14 years ago
|
||
Comment 17•13 years ago
|
||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Updated•12 years ago
|
Comment 22•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 23•12 years ago
|
||
Comment 25•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 26•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 27•11 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (advocacy) |
Comment 29•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 30•3 years ago
|
||
I can still reproduce this issue in menu bar
Comment 31•3 years ago
|
||
Thanks for mentioning it. Apparently the context menu for items under History is identical to the context menu for items under View.
Comment 32•3 years ago
|
||
This is confusing, the opening comment speaks about the Go menu, and then there's a bunch of outdated screenshots, please file a new bug.
Reporter | ||
Comment 33•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Marco Bonardo [:mak] from comment #32)
This is confusing, the opening comment speaks about the Go menu, and then there's a bunch of outdated screenshots, please file a new bug.
Why don't I just reopen this, edit the opening comment, and attach updated screenshots? It's absurd that this is still an issue 17 years later, but it's definitely still present.
Comment 34•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to mmortal03 from comment #33)
Why don't I just reopen this, edit the opening comment, and attach updated screenshots? It's absurd that this is still an issue 17 years later, but it's definitely still present.
Please do not. We have asked for a new bug because this bug in itself is too confusing and references multiple different items and has obsolete discussions. It is much better in this case to start with a clean bug - the age of a bug does not affect when it will be fixed.
Reporter | ||
Comment 35•3 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 36•3 years ago
•
|
||
(In reply to Mark Banner (:standard8) from comment #34)
(In reply to mmortal03 from comment #33)
Why don't I just reopen this, edit the opening comment, and attach updated screenshots? It's absurd that this is still an issue 17 years later, but it's definitely still present.
Please do not. We have asked for a new bug because this bug in itself is too confusing and references multiple different items and has obsolete discussions. It is much better in this case to start with a clean bug - the age of a bug does not affect when it will be fixed.
Ok. Here's a new enhancement request: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1719326
Description
•