Closed
Bug 286283
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Detaching attachments: Need to fix titles of save/select folder dialogues (correct/improve/clarify captions)
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Mail Window Front End, defect)
Thunderbird
Mail Window Front End
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Thunderbird 54.0
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: d.l.edwards.jm)
References
(Depends on 2 open bugs, Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 7 obsolete files)
|
737 bytes,
text/plain
|
bwinton
:
ui-review+
|
Details |
|
3.24 KB,
patch
|
jorgk-bmo
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
1.16 KB,
patch
|
frg
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
David, thanks a bunch for implementing bug 2920! I found a trivial issue when trying to detach attachments. tested with 2005031506-trunk tbird bits on linux fc3. 1. in tbird, go view a message which has attachments. 2. bring up the context menu for any of the attachments in the attachment pane. 3. select either Detach or Detach All... results: as expected, the file picker dialog appears. however, the titlebar says "Save All Attachments" shouldn't the titlebar say something like "Detach File(s)"?
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Yes, that would make more sense, though you are actually saving, then deleting.
Updated•18 years ago
|
QA Contact: front-end
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: mscott → nobody
Updated•14 years ago
|
Blocks: attachUXtracker
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Technically, you are deleting the attachment from the message when you "detach". See bug #580247 and (I guess a dupe) bug #580243. This seems like an easy fix to a localization file somewhere. I'd be happy to fix it myself if I knew where to look.
Updated•13 years ago
|
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Blake, I'd think this is straightforward, 3 mins to ui-review, thanks! STR From attachment panel of message reader, 1) select single attachment, then detach 2) select multiple, but not all attachments, then detach 3) select all attachments, then detach/detach all and look at the titles of the upcoming save/select folder dialogues Actual result 1) Single: Title of save dialogue is "Save Attachment" (but we are detaching, which is not the same action as just saving -> ux-error-prevention?) 2) Multiple: Title of select folder dialogue is "Select Folder", with a subcaption: "Save all attachments" (wrong, we are /detaching/, and only /selected/ attachments) 3) All: Title of select folder dialogue is "Select Folder", with a subcaption: "Save all attachments" (but we are /detaching/) Expected 1) Single: Title of save dialogue should be "Detach Attachment" 2) Multiple: If technically possible: change title bar caption of select folder dialogue to "Detach attachments: Select Folder" (sic, without 'selected' as that would make it too clumsy) otherwise, subcaption should be: "Detach selected attachments" 3) All: If technically possible: change title bar caption of select folder dialogue to "Detach all attachments: Select Folder" otherwise, subcaption should be: "Detach all attachments" Reasons: - The action of detaching is different from just saving, and user should have clear feedback on the first dialogue (ux-feedback, ux-consistency, ux-error-prevention) - need to fix /wrong/ strings (selected vs. all attachments)
Attachment #556366 -
Flags: ui-review?(bwinton)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Severity: trivial → minor
Summary: need to clarify title of detach dialog → Need to correct / fix / improve titles of detach attachment(s) dialogues (save/select folder)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Summary: Need to correct / fix / improve titles of detach attachment(s) dialogues (save/select folder) → Detaching attachments: Need to fix titles of save/select folder dialogues (correct/improve/clarify captions)
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 556366 [details] Request UI-review for better 'save dialogue' title strings when detaching attachments >If technically possible, we should change the title of the dialogue instead: It appears that it's not technically possible (or at least, not easy). But regardless, this seems reasonable to me, so ui-r=me.
Attachment #556366 -
Flags: ui-review?(bwinton) → ui-review+
Updated•13 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [has ui-review+ for new strings in comment 4]
Updated•13 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [has ui-review+ for new strings in comment 4] → [has ui-review+ for new strings in comment 4][good first bug]
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [has ui-review+ for new strings in comment 4][good first bug] → [good first bug][has ui-review+ for new strings in comment 4]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
Is this still an issue if so I would like to work on it.
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dwayne Edwards from comment #6) > Is this still an issue if so I would like to work on it. Yes, this is still an issue, so you are most welcome to work on it...
Assignee: nobody → d.l.edwards.jm
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
I have completed the code however was unable to set the message "Detach selected attachments" as it seems as if the same method is called to delete both all and selected attachments. How would I go about adding this message? Please see attachments for modifications made.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
Added strings: DetachAttachment=Detach Attachment DetachAllAttachments=Detach All Attachments to file
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
Added code:
if(detaching)
GetString(NS_LITERAL_STRING("DetachAllAttachments"), saveAttachmentStr);
else
GetString(NS_LITERAL_STRING("SaveAllAttachments"), saveAttachmentStr);
to lines 912 - 915 and
if(detaching)
GetString(NS_LITERAL_STRING("DetachAttachment"), saveAttachmentStr);
else
GetString(NS_LITERAL_STRING("SaveAttachment"), saveAttachmentStr);
to line 817-820
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
Dwayne, thanks for working on this! :) Looks like you've found the right starting spots to tweak this. 1) Files touched Can you please share the DXR links of the files which you are working on? https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/ There, you can search for your files, like this: "file:abCommon.js" (without quotes). 2) Testing Did you test your changes? If yes, how? 3) Patch file What we ultimately need to review and implement this is a patch file (yourchanges.patch) which has only the diff(erences) between the original files and your files. Our source code is managed in Mercurial repository (Hg). On Windows, for trivial changes, you might chose the route of least resistance and handcraft the file: - download original source file from https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/ - modify a copy of that file in your same local folder - use WinMerge application to create the patch file (diff): Select both files in your local folder, right-click, WinMerge, then within Winmerge: Tools > Generate Patch > Style:Unified; context:7; Result: yourfolder\yourdiff.patch. I added a trivial example on bug 11383: attachment 8838420 [details] (original source file) attachment 8838420 [details] (modified source file) attachment 8838419 [details] [diff] [review] (your local diff/patch file) Here's a real world example (using correct patch header, not your local folder paths): Attachment 8819569 [details] [diff] (Hg patch file) Better ways of creating functional patches: * On Windows, install TortoiseHg application and download TB source code repository to your own computer. Then you can edit source files locally and creating patches becomes a lot easier. However, you can't test changes which require building Thunderbird from source code. * You're touching c++ files; hence, if you want to test your changes yourself, you have to build Thunderbird (non-trivial): https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Build_Instructions/Simple_Thunderbird_build
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
Source files and patch files must use Unix line breaks (LF), and UTF-8. Notepad++ is an excellent source code editor for Windows.
Comment 13•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dwayne Edwards from comment #8) > I have completed the code however was unable to set the message "Detach > selected attachments" as it seems as if the same method is called to delete > both all and selected attachments. How would I go about adding this message? > Please see attachments for modifications made. It'll be much easier to understand your modifications made when you offer us the links to files touched and a proper patch file. If both scenarios use the same function, and that function calls the dialogue, I'd think that you could add a trailing boolean argument to the function to indicate whether it's about all or selected attachments. Or that check could be done inside the function, before calling the dialogue. It's a bit hard to tell without knowing the actual function you're talking about. For knowing if it's all or selected attachments, I imagine there's something like selection.count which can be compared to the total number of attachments (not sure how to get that, maybe the total count of attachment tree items). You'll probably also want to use Thunderbird Daily and install DOM Inspector Addon for Thunderbird.
Comment 14•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Thomas D. from comment #11) > I added a trivial example on bug 11383: > attachment 8838420 [details] (original source file) > attachment 8838420 [details] (modified source file) Typo: attachment 8838421 [details] (modified source file) > attachment 8838419 [details] [diff] [review] (your local diff/patch file)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•8 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the support. I have provided the DXR links to the files I have modified and attached the patch. As it relates to testing I compiled thunderbird and used an email that contained multiple attachments and manually went through the process of detaching the attachments. Still unable to determine how to differentiate between selected and all since the only section of code I was able to observe that contained the total number of attachment is a javascript file that calls the functions in nsMessenger.cpp DXR link for modified cpp file: https://dxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/mailnews/base/src/nsMessenger.cpp DXR link for modified property file: https://dxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/mail/locales/en-US/chrome/messenger/messenger.properties
| Assignee | ||
Comment 16•8 years ago
|
||
Added conditional statement to nsMessager.cpp
| Assignee | ||
Comment 17•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 18•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8838906 [details] [diff] [review] nsMessenger.cpp modifications Review of attachment 8838906 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Could you just export the hg diff for all the modifications to all files? ::: C:/Users/Dwayne/Desktop/nsMessenger.cpp @@ +814,5 @@ > nsString defaultDisplayString; > ConvertAndSanitizeFileName(aDisplayName, defaultDisplayString); > > + if(detaching) > + GetString(NS_LITERAL_STRING("DetachAttachment"), saveAttachmentStr); nit: spaces like this, and use two space indenting and braces if (detaching) { GetString(NS_LITERAL_STRING("DetachAttachment"), saveAttachmentStr); } else { GetString(NS_LITERAL_STRING("SaveAttachment"), saveAttachmentStr); }
| Assignee | ||
Comment 19•8 years ago
|
||
I apologize for that I am not very familiar with hg. I have applied the changes to the nsMessenger.cpp. Please let me know if there is any issue with this since I am still not sure if I exported the patch correctly
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8838906 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8838907 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 20•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8838934 [details] [diff] [review] Single patch file with all changes Review of attachment 8838934 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Much better thanks! Please also add a commit message to your patch. For this bug that might be "Bug 286283 - fix titles of for detach attachment dialogs. " After that the next step is getting your patch reviewed, you can have me review it. http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Getting_your_patch_in_the_tree#Getting_the_patch_reviewed To avoid whitespace, add this line to your .hgrc file's [hooks] section post-qrefresh.whitespace = hg qdiff | (! egrep --color -C 2 -n '^\+.*\s$') ::: mailnews/base/src/nsMessenger.cpp @@ +814,4 @@ > nsString defaultDisplayString; > ConvertAndSanitizeFileName(aDisplayName, defaultDisplayString); > > + if (detaching) { nit: here, and elsewhere, just one space before the braces @@ +911,4 @@ > nsString saveAttachmentStr; > > NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, rv); > + nit: some trailing whitespace snuck in here @@ +917,5 @@ > + } > + else { > + GetString(NS_LITERAL_STRING("SaveAllAttachments"), saveAttachmentStr); > + } > + whitespace
| Assignee | ||
Comment 21•8 years ago
|
||
Added commit comment and removed whitespaces
Attachment #8839249 -
Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Comment 22•8 years ago
|
||
Looks like Magnus is busy with other reviews, so I'll do this review for him. I fixed the commit message and remove some trailing white-space you still had. I'll land the patch tomorrow. Thanks for your contribution!
Attachment #8838302 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8838306 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8838905 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8838934 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8839249 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8839249 -
Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Attachment #8841376 -
Flags: review+
Updated•8 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [good first bug][has ui-review+ for new strings in comment 4]
Comment 23•8 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/eb90c44e468e1be1a2f0078e89d004244da67298
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 54.0
Comment 24•8 years ago
|
||
Are the strings not needed in suite\locales\en-US\chrome\mailnews\messenger.properties too?
Flags: needinfo?(jorgk)
Comment 26•8 years ago
|
||
Yes or I upload a patch and you give it an r+.
Comment 27•8 years ago
|
||
So sorry about missing that :-(
Attachment #8841524 -
Flags: review?(frgrahl)
Comment 28•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8841524 [details] [diff] [review] 286283-suite.patch no problem.
Attachment #8841524 -
Flags: review?(frgrahl) → review+
Comment 29•8 years ago
|
||
Done: https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/23d4272c269c1df846f17300b7a8a3c998c6c88b Thanks for being alert!
Comment 30•8 years ago
|
||
Thanks Jörg for speeding this up and landing. It's a nice incremental improvement. However, this doesn't fully fix this bug per STR in comment 4: When detaching only *selected* attachments (say 3 out of 4, via attachmet context menu), we still wrongly claim to "Detach *all* attachments". Assignee asked for assistance on this problem several times, lastly in comment 15. I suggest that bugs should only be marked fixed after double-checking with the specifications of expected results as developed on the bug and ui-reviewed. Otherwise, in case of (deliberate/accepted/temporary) omissions pls comment why and/or move them to a new bug. In this case, I suggest to just fix this here, for which Jörg's assistance would be most welcome.
Comment 31•8 years ago
|
||
Also, I haven't seen any comment why this patch doesn't realize the ui-reviewed dialogue title strings of comment 4, e.g. "Detach attachments: Select Folder". Variations might be possible as to how we distribute the necessary information between dialogue title and sub-caption, but they should be explained and undergo ui-review.
Comment 32•8 years ago
|
||
Thanks, I see this now. Looks like we have nsMessenger::SaveOneAttachment() and nsMessenger::SaveAllAttachments(). I haven't looked at how "more than one but not all" is distinguished from "all" (which could also be just one). If someone wanted to investigate, I'm sure we'd accept another patch. The easiest way out would of course be to lose the "All" in the title, so just make it "Save Attachments". Re. comment #15: I don't see either function called in JS code (not that I looked very thoroughly).
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•