Release Jetpack SDK 0.2

RESOLVED FIXED in 0.2

Status

P1
normal
RESOLVED FIXED
9 years ago
8 years ago

People

(Reporter: avarma, Assigned: myk)

Tracking

unspecified
x86
Mac OS X
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(Reporter)

Description

9 years ago
This is a tracking bug for all dependencies on 0.2.
(Reporter)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 551042
(Reporter)

Comment 1

9 years ago
I'm also not sure whether we should be using Bugzilla's "Target Milestone" system to plan releases of the Jetpack SDK, or if we should just continue using tracking bugs like this one and bug 549017.
(Assignee)

Comment 2

9 years ago
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'm also not sure whether we should be using Bugzilla's "Target Milestone"
> system to plan releases of the Jetpack SDK, or if we should just continue using
> tracking bugs like this one and bug 549017.

Good question. We're currently using these tracking bugs, let's continue doing so for the moment while deliberating whether to change.
Assignee: nobody → myk
Priority: -- → P1
Target Milestone: -- → 0.2
Version: 0.2 → unspecified
(Reporter)

Comment 3

9 years ago
Moved over all dependencies from bug 550511.
Depends on: 550363, 550368, 551307
(Reporter)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 553057
(Reporter)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 553064
(Reporter)

Comment 4

9 years ago
I just remembered that the last part of the Jetpack SDK's 'Programs' tutorial says this:

"""
Right now, the Jetpack SDK is at an early stage of development. There's not too much to show. But be on the lookout for version 0.2 of the SDK, which will continue this tutorial and show you how to build a useful Jetpack-based Firefox or Thunderbird extension that you can distribute to your friends, foes, and family!
"""

What should we do about this, since 0.2 doesn't actually introduce any new functionality?
(Reporter)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 553744
Depends on: 554158
(Reporter)

Comment 5

9 years ago
Filed a new bug for comment 4. It is bug 554187.
(Reporter)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 554187
(Assignee)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 553718
(Assignee)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 554375
(Assignee)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 554377
(Assignee)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 554378
(Reporter)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 554479
(Reporter)

Comment 6

9 years ago
I went ahead and added bug 554241 to the dependencies for this; it's related to fixing bug 553744. I suspect we will probably mark bug 553744 as WONTFIX and will replace it with bug 554241.
Depends on: 554241
(Reporter)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 554712
(Reporter)

Updated

9 years ago
Depends on: 554720
(Assignee)

Updated

9 years ago
No longer depends on: 554479
(Assignee)

Updated

9 years ago
No longer depends on: 554712
(Assignee)

Updated

9 years ago
No longer depends on: 553064
(Assignee)

Comment 7

9 years ago
All 0.2 release work has been done, including the blog post and a notice to the discussion forum <http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla-labs-jetpack/browse_thread/thread/4bfde31170716122>.  Version 0.2 is shipped!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
(Assignee)

Comment 8

8 years ago
The Add-on SDK is no longer a Mozilla Labs experiment and has become a big enough project to warrant its own Bugzilla product, so the "Add-on SDK" product has been created for it, and I am moving its bugs to that product.

To filter bugmail related to this change, filter on the word "looptid".
Component: Jetpack SDK → General
Product: Mozilla Labs → Add-on SDK
QA Contact: jetpack-sdk → general
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.