Closed
Bug 985995
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
BB . Visual Refresh. Create separate headers for Comms Apps
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System, defect)
Tracking
(feature-b2g:2.0, tracking-b2g:backlog, b2g-v2.0 fixed)
VERIFIED
FIXED
2.0 S2 (23may)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
b2g-v2.0 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: vicky, Assigned: gtorodelvalle)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
Create an independent header for Comms apps, both Dialer, Contacts and Messaging so it has a different color. It should be green instead of Orange but the rest od apps will remain the same.
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → kyee
Cool, there's a name for that kind of apps we could use in our code? We already have skin-dark for multimedia and skin-organic for settings :)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Arnau March [:arnau] from comment #1) > Cool, there's a name for that kind of apps we could use in our code? We > already have skin-dark for multimedia and skin-organic for settings :) Good idea! We can call it "Comms-skin" and then later on include the rest of controls to complete the suite. Thanks!
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: 2.0-visual-refresh
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: kyee → gtorodelvalle
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(arnau)
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
Cool thanks!
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(arnau) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review+ → review?(jmcf)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Once we have José Manuel's r+, I'll ask the Dialer and SMS peers ;-)
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
r+ for the contacts part
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(jmcf) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
Next is Mr. Etienne :-)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review+ → review?(etienne)
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
Redirecting to Rik, you can safely send future visual refresh related PR to him :)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(etienne) → review?(anthony)
Blocks: 989933
No longer blocks: 2.0-visual-refresh
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details] 17528.html (You can put multiple review flags on one patch to track that it has been reviewed by everyone. Use the "addl. review" at the bottom of the flag list) I'm not seeing the effect of those class changes. I don't see any code with 'skin-comms' landed yet. Also, we need to update the fake header of the contacts tab (it appears before we load the contacts iframe, see bug 943779)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(anthony) → review-
:rik, this is a first patch to add classes to all comms html files. There will be a new PR adding a new skin in headers Building block
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
I prefer landing this together or building blocks first then comms. But I can't r+ this without seeing the effects.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details] 17528.html Re-asking review from Anthony according to comment 11 by Arnau ;-) Asking review from Francisco regarding the SMS app change.
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(francisco.jordano)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(anthony)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
Ups, sorry, I didn't read last Anthony's comment... Deleting the review flags... How shall we proceed, Arnau?
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(francisco.jordano)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(anthony)
Flags: needinfo?(arnau)
ok, I'll work on bug 989933
Flags: needinfo?(arnau)
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details] 17528.html :Rik, could you please review that patch again? Now that bug 989933 has landed you will see the new green headers. Please note that centered title will come in a different patch.
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(anthony)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → 1.4 S6 (25apr)
Comment 17•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details] 17528.html - This patch needs rebasing. - It's not adressing part of comment 10: "we need to update the fake header of the contacts tab (it appears before we load the contacts iframe, see bug 943779)" I'm also concerned by the contrast. If you look at a Buri with a slight vertical angle, it's really hard to read the titles. Vicky: I think we'll need to change the combination of colors.
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(anthony) → review-
Flags: needinfo?(vpg)
I know for sure Vicky has tested this in on all available devices, and she is ok with the contrast. I'll ni Przemek to have some feedback from another member of the VD team, just in case we could unlock this issue before Vicky comes back from her PTO :) Przemek, is contrast in Buri good enought for you with new comms headers?
Flags: needinfo?(pabratowski)
Comment 19•10 years ago
|
||
#3cc with white text as a ratio of 2. WCAG recommends at least 3. The current orange (F97C17) has a ratio of 2.65. That was already not enough but at least closer to recommendations. http://contrast-finder.tanaguru.com/result.html?foreground=%23FFF&background=%233cc&isBackgroundTested=true&ratio=3&algo=Rgb
Comment 20•10 years ago
|
||
I agree we can pump up the contrast a bit but not all the way up to 3.0. I don't want to make this change without meeting and discussing with Vicky, I'll try to meet with her on Monday.
Flags: needinfo?(pabratowski)
Comment 21•10 years ago
|
||
Przemek: Why shouldn't we go to 3.0? WCAG is based on a bunch of research and norms so if you want to have an exception, I'd like to see a good reason supporting that exception. I think we should try to respect that 3.0 as much as possible because a phone can be used in very poor lighting conditions so it makes even more sense. Eitan: Do we have a minimum contrast ratio currently recommended for Gaia?
Flags: needinfo?(pabratowski)
Flags: needinfo?(eitan)
Comment 22•10 years ago
|
||
I agree we should use the WCAG contrast ratios as a guideline as much as possible, especially when dealing with large bodies of text. I plan to meet with Vicky when she returns from her PTO to discuss this further.
Flags: needinfo?(pabratowski)
Comment 23•10 years ago
|
||
Agreed, WCAG FTW. I am mostly concerned about the SMS text bubbles with low contrast.
Flags: needinfo?(eitan)
Reporter | ||
Comment 24•10 years ago
|
||
Hi all, After checking on device and discussing the color issue with Przemek we decided not to change the header color, as tested in different screens, it doesn't look like there's a legibility risk. Nevertheless I made changes to the messages bubbles in the thread to reach the optimal contrast. YOu can see the update here: https://bug950175.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8408358
Flags: needinfo?(vpg)
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
Hi Anthony, would you be so kind to re-review the patch, please? Your comments should now be all covered.
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review- → review?(anthony)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [p=1]
Target Milestone: 1.4 S6 (25apr) → 2.0 S1 (9may)
Updated•10 years ago
|
QA Contact: lolimartinezcr
Reporter | ||
Comment 26•10 years ago
|
||
Due to the contrast ratio issue, colors have been adjusted. Please change the header's background color to #00adad. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(gtorodelvalle)
Flags: needinfo?(arnau)
Comment 27•10 years ago
|
||
We also need to convert the remaining SVG files to PNG.
Comment 28•10 years ago
|
||
Please note any contrast improvements should also benefit users in areas of high ambient light (e.g. a sunny park).
Flags: needinfo?(arnau)
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•10 years ago
|
||
@Vicky: comment 26 is being taken care in bug 1005802 which has already landed so we will inherit it in this PR ;-) Thanks for noticing!
Flags: needinfo?(gtorodelvalle)
Assignee | ||
Comment 30•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
Switching the reviewer to Etienne to let Anthony enjoy his PTO as much as possible ;-)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(anthony) → review?(etienne)
Comment 31•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
comments on github
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(etienne)
Updated•10 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: --- → backlog
feature-b2g: --- → 2.0
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(etienne)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: feedback?(arnau)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [p=1]
Target Milestone: 2.0 S1 (9may) → 2.0 S2 (23may)
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
Awesome! thanks Germán
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: feedback?(arnau) → feedback+
Comment 33•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
Anthony is back :)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(etienne) → review?(anthony)
Comment 34•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8396321 [details]
17528.html
Looks good to me but I'd like the peers of SMS and Contacts to take a look at the result and see if it works correctly in those apps.
Also, you need a quick rebase of the pull request.
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(jmcf)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(felash)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(anthony)
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(jmcf)
Assignee | ||
Comment 36•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8396321 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8396321 -
Flags: review?(felash)
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: review?(jmcf)
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: feedback?(arnau)
Flags: needinfo?(gtorodelvalle)
Comment on attachment 8425311 [details]
19419.html
Looking forward to see this on the phone! Looks awesome :)
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: feedback?(arnau) → feedback+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: review?(felash)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: review+
Comment 38•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8425311 [details]
19419.html
the Facebook headers appear with the green background instead of the blue one.
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: review?(jmcf) → review-
Comment 39•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8425311 [details]
19419.html
r=me for the sms part
I'm sure there will be glitches in some subpanels but we'll look at them once we have every big patches.
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: review?(felash) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 40•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8425311 [details]
19419.html
Fix proposed by Arnau included in the patch :-) Please, review it once more time :-) Thanks!
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: review- → review?(jmcf)
Comment 41•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8425311 [details]
19419.html
FB Link page is incorrect with the patch
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: review?(jmcf) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 42•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8425311 [details]
19419.html
Let's see if this is the one... :-S
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: review- → review?(jmcf)
Comment 43•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8425311 [details]
19419.html
now we are talking.
German and Arnau, thanks!
Attachment #8425311 -
Flags: review?(jmcf) → review+
Comment 44•10 years ago
|
||
https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/a9813941acd4588c0ce14a39780a3816d895aa6b
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•10 years ago
|
status-b2g-v2.0:
--- → fixed
Comment 45•10 years ago
|
||
Related with this you can see this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1013994
Comment 46•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jose Manuel Cantera from comment #44) > https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/ > a9813941acd4588c0ce14a39780a3816d895aa6b For this reason, this bug is verified.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•9 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: backlog → ---
tracking-b2g:
--- → backlog
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•