Closed
Bug 208882
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
remove preference imageblocker.enabled
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: Image Blocking, defect)
Core
Graphics: Image Blocking
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: danielwang, Assigned: mconnor)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: polish)
Attachments
(2 files, 2 obsolete files)
15.06 KB,
patch
|
alecf
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
15.32 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
in /extensions/cookie/nsImgManager.cpp revision 1.19, checked in by bzbarsky,
per bug 191380, preference "imageblocker.enabled" appears out of nowhere. This
pref appears to be a relic from Netscape 7. Several bug reports seem to indicate
that Netscape 7 users have trouble with this "hidden" pref. I suggest that we
remove this preference.
I could only find two source files using this pref:
/extensions/cookie/nsImgManager.cpp
/extensions/cookie/nsImgManager.h
bugs mentioning this pref:
bug 33139 bug 35981 bug 43195 bug 43209
bug 51958 bug 36514 bug 91881 bug 66645
bug 47628 bug 47253 bug 74369 bug 41057
bug 112520 bug 62615 bug 84224
btw, shouldn't bug 33576 be moved to image:blocking component?
![]() |
||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Hint: ccing the patch author and reviewer is a great deal more useful than
ccing the person who checked in the patch. The former may even have an idea of
what's in the code or something...
![]() |
||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Oh, and as for source files using the pref... you clearly missed all.js,
pref-images.xul, cookieContextOverlay.xul, cookieNavigatorOverlay.xul.
Sure looks to me like the pref does something useful....
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
I personaly won't mind removing the pref. But i don't know why it is there. IT
already appears in version 1.1 of the (now removed) file nsImages.cpp.
So, if anyone knows why it is there, please let me know :) Otherwise, i will be
glad to see it gone.
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
i don't see the point behind this pref... it's just used to disable the blocking
functions in the "images" prefpane. would we not always want them on?
as long as they're not useful to mozilla, we should be able to remove it...
embeddors should be providing their own impl of nsImgManager if they want random
other prefs.
mvl, if you agree, want to whip up a patch to remove it?
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
As far as I can make out, only Netscape ever used this pref. Firebird has it
in firebird.js, but doesn't use it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 139850 [details] [diff] [review]
remove the pref
about time I attached a patch that removes bloat :)
Attachment #139850 -
Flags: review?(dwitte)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
cc-ing project owners for the other two products that include this preference.
mscott: should all.js be removed from thunderbird now that you have a
thunderbird.js?
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 139850 [details] [diff] [review]
remove the pref
dwitte seems pretty busy. mvl?
Attachment #139850 -
Flags: review?(dwitte) → review?(mvl)
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
pretty busy eh? mumble mumble... ;)
but yeah, please review this mvl, you like xul/js fu more than i do. :)
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 139850 [details] [diff] [review]
remove the pref
>Index: mozilla/extensions/cookie/nsImgManager.cpp
>- if (PREF_CHANGED(kImageBlockerPrefName) &&
>- NS_SUCCEEDED(aPrefBranch->GetBoolPref(kImageBlockerPrefName, &val)))
>- mBlockerPref = val;
You should remove mBlockerPref from the .h too.
>Index: mozilla/extensions/cookie/resources/content/cookieNavigatorOverlay.xul
> // for some unexplainable reason, CheckForImage() keeps getting called repeatedly
> // as we mouse over the task menu. IMO, that shouldn't be happening. To avoid
> // taking a performance hit due to this, we will set the following flag to avoid
> // reexecuting the routine
> var alreadyCheckedForImage = false;
You can remove the comment as alreadyCheckedForImage isn't needed anymore.
>@@ -87,22 +82,14 @@
> // determine if image manager should be in the UI
> if (alreadyCheckedForImage) {
> return;
> }
> alreadyCheckedForImage = true;
>- // remove image functions (unless overruled by the "imageblocker.enabled" pref)
>- try {
>- if (!pref.getBoolPref("imageblocker.enabled")) {
>- HideImage();
>- }
>- } catch(e) {
>- HideImage();
>- }
> }
because it was just to not run this block, which is removed now anyway.
Also, dont forget
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/calendar/sunbird/app/profile/all.js#472
fix that, and r=mvl. For now, i don't like useless stuff floating around ;)
Attachment #139850 -
Flags: review?(mvl) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
Attachment #139850 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 140160 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v2
added the entries in Thunderbird and Calendar to this one
Attachment #140160 -
Flags: review?(mvl)
Comment 14•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 140160 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v2
r=mvl
Attachment #140160 -
Flags: review?(mvl) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #140160 -
Flags: superreview?(bz-vacation)
![]() |
||
Comment 15•21 years ago
|
||
I may well not get to this in time for 1.7a; if you can find anyone else to do
the sr, that would be much appreciated....
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #140160 -
Flags: superreview?(bz-vacation) → superreview?(alecf)
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #140160 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #140160 -
Flags: superreview?(alecf)
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•21 years ago
|
||
missed a spot
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #140326 -
Flags: superreview?(alecf)
Comment 17•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 140326 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v3
I remember the history on this - basically the Netscape marketing department
didn't think it was a good idea to include image blocking, because their
advertisers wouldn't like it. (because obviously the point of this is to block
ads!)
but hey, good riddens...
but before you continue any further, can you move mPermissionManager to be
declared before all the PRPackedBool/PRUint8 attributes in nsImgManager.h? It
doesn't affect us now, but if we add/delete other PRPackedBool's, I'd like to
see them declared at the end of the class.
sr=alecf
(by the way, when are we moving all this permission management stuff out of
extensions/cookie?)
Attachment #140326 -
Flags: superreview?(alecf) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•21 years ago
|
||
Comment 19•21 years ago
|
||
checked in for mconnor. thx for the patch!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 20•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 140327 [details] [diff] [review]
patch with move of mPermissionManager per SR comments
This local variable can go too, it's not doing anything (in fact it could have
gone before, we already have a global of the same name...)
>
> var pref;
> pref = Components.classes['@mozilla.org/preferences-service;1'];
> pref = pref.getService();
> pref = pref.QueryInterface(Components.interfaces.nsIPrefBranch);
>-
>- // determine if image manager should be in the UI
>- if (alreadyCheckedForImage) {
>- return;
>- }
>- alreadyCheckedForImage = true;
>- // remove image functions (unless overruled by the "imageblocker.enabled" pref)
>- try {
>- if (!pref.getBoolPref("imageblocker.enabled")) {
>- HideImage();
>- }
>- } catch(e) {
>- HideImage();
>- }
> }
Comment 21•21 years ago
|
||
for completeness, this pref was partially brought back to life on the 1.7 branch
only.
see http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=244531
it will not be brought back to life on the trunk.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•