Find as you type = off pref, should respect typeaheadfind and not allow autostart
Categories
(Toolkit :: Find Toolbar, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: Peter6, Unassigned, Mentored, NeedInfo)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [good-next-bug])
Attachments
(1 file)
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
Comment 10•19 years ago
|
||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•19 years ago
|
||
Comment 13•19 years ago
|
||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Updated•9 years ago
|
Comment 16•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 18•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 19•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 20•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 21•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 22•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 23•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 24•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 25•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 26•7 years ago
|
||
Comment 27•6 years ago
|
||
:mikedeboer, could you fix the issue with the commit message ?
Comment 28•3 years ago
|
||
The bug assignee didn't login in Bugzilla in the last 7 months.
:mcheang, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Comment 29•3 years ago
|
||
After reading through the comments, I see that a patch was submitted to fix this and it was approved.
Previously, it failed to land because there was an issue with the commit message.
Since this patch was put up 4 years ago and was already approved. I'd recommend re-basing it to central, testing it manually again, and running the test against the patch on TRY. And lastly, fix the format of the commit message.
Since we're doing the hand over of triage owner today. I'll ask if you can do the above steps recommended, Neil, when you are able to. Thank you.
Comment 30•3 years ago
|
||
I'm still here and happy to do the rebase; I didn't realize anyone still cared about this bug based on its age (18 years!) and the difficulty finding anyone to land it when the patch was reviewed & approved in 2018.
Comment 31•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to spillner from comment #30)
I'm still here and happy to do the rebase
Thanks for sticking around after so long :)!
If you could do the rebase and fix the commit message. It could help Neil with landing this bug. Of course, we would have to check that the patch still works. But the first and easy step seems to be the commit message.
Comment 32•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to spillner from comment #30)
I'm still here and happy to do the rebase; I didn't realize anyone still cared about this bug based on its age (18 years!) and the difficulty finding anyone to land it when the patch was reviewed & approved in 2018.
Yeah, this doesn't seem to have gone well - apologies for that.
How did you get on trying to rebase the patch? Do let us know if you get stuck - it'd be a shame if this bug got lost for another 4 years. :-)
Comment 33•3 years ago
|
||
Redirect a needinfo that is pending on an inactive user to the triage owner.
:enndeakin, since the bug has high priority and recent activity, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 34•3 years ago
|
||
The severity field for this bug is relatively low, S3. However, the bug has 6 duplicates and 11 votes.
:enndeakin, could you consider increasing the bug severity?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Comment 35•3 years ago
|
||
The last needinfo from me was triggered in error by recent activity on the bug. I'm clearing the needinfo since this is a very old bug and I don't know if it's still relevant.
Description
•