Status

()

defect
P3
normal
VERIFIED FIXED
19 years ago
10 years ago

People

(Reporter: trudelle, Assigned: trudelle)

Tracking

({meta})

Trunk
Future
x86
Windows 98
Points:
---
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

Assignee

Description

19 years ago
Tracker for my team's '+' bugs for PR2

Updated

19 years ago
Keywords: meta
Assignee

Updated

19 years ago
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee

Updated

19 years ago
Target Milestone: --- → M22

Comment 1

19 years ago
no longer relevant, closing.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED

Updated

18 years ago
No longer depends on: 29636

Comment 2

18 years ago
Snort. Huh? Yawn. Woke me up (but removing that dependency was a little silly).

-> rsverified dead.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED

Comment 3

18 years ago
Sorry about that, but I'll be a little more silly while I'm at it.  No harm, no
foul, right? If it's not a real dependency, I don't want to see it. 
Theoretically, Bugzilla should automate this...

Bugs 12761, 28594, 32155, and 35726 no longer block this, as this bug has been
resolved.  Updating.
Depends on: 29636
No longer depends on: 12761, 28594, 32155, 35726

Comment 4

18 years ago
But (a) closed bugs listed in the 'blocks' field of still extant bugs
do _not_ block those extant bugs, (b) you're destroying bugzilla
"history", and (c) given point (a), this is just spam that no one
needs.

I'm not going to add those bugs back (and induce a second flurry of spam),
but I'd prefer that this type of housekeeping _not_ be done.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.