[meta] Multiple tier 2 failures happening on a11y-checks
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: noriszfay, Assigned: ayeddi)
References
(Blocks 2 open bugs)
Details
(Keywords: intermittent-failure, meta, Whiteboard: [stockwell unknown])
Attachments
(5 files)
Multiple accessibility tier 2 failures caused by the following push on M-a11y-checks & M-swr-a11y-checks with some of them being perma.
Failures seen here.
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
The Bugbug bot thinks this bug should belong to the 'Core::Disability Access APIs' component, and is moving the bug to that component. Please correct in case you think the bot is wrong.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
We are working on enabling Tier 2 a11y-checks to ensure our products have basic accessibility built-in (bug 1692110) and before that, we need to prepare the existing code base. While we triage and investigate existent tests that would fail once the a11y-checks are enabled in the CI, we are going to expect to be failing these tests altogether and then handle each one of them individually.
This task is to expect failing of these tests with fail-if
condition of the failing tests while we continue investigation into the reasons these tests failed and to be able to backtrack these tests once they're resolved.
Related bugs:
- Fail-if tests: meta bug 1848402
- Explore capturing click events for a11y_checks: bug 1692110
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•2 years ago
|
||
hello Anna, could you take a look at these remaining tier 2 bugs that still linger on autoland? Thank you!
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Reporter | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Norisz Fay [:noriszfay] from comment #13)
hello Anna, could you take a look at these remaining tier 2 bugs that still linger on autoland? Thank you!
Will write a patch today, thank you for the link!
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•2 years ago
|
||
There are some a11y_checks that are intermittently failing on Autoland and pass on Try and vice versa. Also, a couple of tests are crashing while performing a11y_checks, thus they are to be skipped while we continue the investigation into each of them.
Related bugs:
- Fail-if tests: meta bug 1848402
- Explore capturing click events for a11y_checks: bug 1692110
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Updated•2 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 26•2 years ago
|
||
Comment 27•2 years ago
|
||
Hi, if the patch is supposed to fix the issues, I think it is not working: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=autoland&group_state=expanded&selectedTaskRun=G_PNoAaqQUGar4gJoCafLQ.0&revision=4091bed4a0aae7772537e08e6cb49bf0bc7434c9&searchStr=Linux%2C18.04%2Cx64%2CWebRender%2Copt%2CMochitests%2Cwith%2Caccessibility%2Cchecks%2Cenabled%2Ctest-linux1804-64-qr%2Fopt-mochitest can you please take another look?
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•2 years ago
|
||
There are some a11y_checks that are intermittently failing on Autoland and pass on Try and vice versa. Also, a couple of tests are crashing while performing a11y_checks, thus they are to be skipped while we continue the investigation into each of them.
Related bugs:
- Fail-if tests: meta bug 1848402
- Explore capturing click events for a11y_checks: bug 1692110
Updated•2 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 29•2 years ago
|
||
Hi Joel. Do you have any idea why a11y-checks jobs would be running on Mac (example)? As I understand it, they should only be running on Linux as tier 2 at this stage. The eventual goal is to run them on all platforms, but we're not there yet, so this was surprising to us.
Comment 30•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 32•2 years ago
|
||
that was added with the add-new
action, which allows you to add all kinds of things, even if they are not supported. In this case you could add it for linux, windows, mac, but not android because android doesn't run any browser-chrome tests.
There is no default scheduling or other ways to make this work, so I think you are ok.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
![]() |
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 37•2 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 38•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 41•2 years ago
|
||
This is still happening a lot, here are some examples:
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433684835&repo=autoland&lineNumber=23680
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433693142&repo=autoland&lineNumber=36219
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433690190&repo=autoland&lineNumber=9586
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433690206&repo=autoland&lineNumber=21944
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433666294&repo=autoland&lineNumber=51381
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433666392&repo=autoland&lineNumber=13742
Ana, could you please take a look?
Thanks,
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 45•2 years ago
•
|
||
(In reply to Noemi Erli[:noemi_erli] from comment #41)
This is still happening a lot, here are some examples:
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433684835&repo=autoland&lineNumber=23680 => filed crash bug 1861277
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433693142&repo=autoland&lineNumber=36219 => in the Pt.4 patch
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433690190&repo=autoland&lineNumber=9586 => in the Pt.4 patch
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433690206&repo=autoland&lineNumber=21944 => updated crash bug 1857056
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433666294&repo=autoland&lineNumber=51381 => crash bug 1849230
- https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer?job_id=433666392&repo=autoland&lineNumber=13742 => updated crash bug 1857744
Ana, could you please take a look?
Thanks,
Thank you for the ping, Noemi! I added comments next to each line above and submitted a patch for a review.
Assignee | ||
Comment 46•2 years ago
|
||
There are some a11y_checks that are intermittently failing on Autoland and pass on Try and vice versa. Also, a couple of tests are crashing while performing a11y_checks, thus they are to be skipped while we continue the investigation into each of them.
Related bugs:
- Fail-if tests: meta bug 1848402
- Explore capturing click events for a11y_checks: bug 1692110
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 49•2 years ago
|
||
Comment 50•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Reporter | ||
Comment 52•2 years ago
|
||
Hey Anna, could you take a look at these tests too? It seems a few are still remaining here and there such as: browser_panelUINotifications_multiWindow.js, browser_doorhanger_installs.js.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 59•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Norisz Fay [:noriszfay] from comment #52)
Hey Anna, could you take a look at these tests too? It seems a few are still remaining here and there such as: browser_panelUINotifications_multiWindow.js, browser_doorhanger_installs.js.
Thank you, Norisz!
I filed a separate bug 1863815 to fix the browser_panelUINotifications_multiWindow.js
failure and the patch for it is under the review.
I could not find any new instanced of the browser_doorhanger_installs.js
failing, but I keep tracking the failures across the board. If there won't be any new failure, I'll close this bug when the bug 1863815 is closed too. Unless there would new failures appear...
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Reporter | ||
Comment 63•2 years ago
|
||
Hey Anna, this failure seems to be lingering around recently, could you take a look please? Thank you! Failure log here
Assignee | ||
Comment 64•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Norisz Fay [:noriszfay] from comment #63)
Hey Anna, this failure seems to be lingering around recently, could you take a look please? Thank you! Failure log here
Hey Norisz, I just pushed the WIP patch for these few tests to Try - I'll be adding this as a part 2 patch for the bug 1863584 since these tests were reenabled in there but not fail-if
ed. They used to just crash, so it was not clear if they could be failing or not.
Thank you for bringing them up!
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Reporter | ||
Comment 67•2 years ago
|
||
Some "new" failure seems to have appeared as can be seen here, could you take a look please? Thank you! Log here.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Reporter | ||
Comment 69•2 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 74•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Norisz Fay [:noriszfay] from comment #69)
Hey Anna, any chance you could take a look at this one too? Thank you! Log here
Thank you, Norisz! Opening that one now - it looks like the failures were fixed, which is great news :)
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 77•2 years ago
|
||
Since the major accessibility remediation work is on the way, one more test is now passing the Tier 2 a11y-checks, thus we are removing the fail-if
condition from its manifest to allow for the test harness to expect appropriate results (passing).
Related bugs: bug 1849028, bug 1867062
Updated•2 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 79•2 years ago
|
||
Comment 80•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 89•1 year ago
|
||
It's been a while since any unexpected a11y-checks were failing for the pre-existent (before Oct 2023) tests, so I'm closing this bug for now.
Feel free to reopen it, if there are any new concerns.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Description
•