Closed
Bug 1060901
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
[tb31.1 only] expand mail list broken for lists whose description is quoted
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Composition, defect)
Tracking
(thunderbird32 unaffected, thunderbird33 unaffected, thunderbird34 unaffected, thunderbird35 unaffected, thunderbird_esr3132+ fixed)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Thunderbird 31.0
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
thunderbird32 | --- | unaffected |
thunderbird33 | --- | unaffected |
thunderbird34 | --- | unaffected |
thunderbird35 | --- | unaffected |
thunderbird_esr31 | 32+ | fixed |
People
(Reporter: mkmelin, Assigned: mkmelin)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [regression:tb31.1])
Attachments
(1 file)
3.10 KB,
patch
|
jcranmer
:
review+
standard8
:
approval-comm-esr31+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
So when bug 1008718 landed on ESR the associated test turned orange and was disabled.
Although list expansion normally do work, I now see the case it apparently caught was that lists where the list description is set to a multi word description -> the description is quoted -> the list expansion fails.
This is not a problem for 32+, as something between 31 and 32 changed the quoting. On 32+ the description is never quoted afaikt. I would guess bug 790855, but that patch doesn't apply cleanly so i didn't verify it.
Attachment #8481911 -
Flags: review?(Pidgeot18)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Version: Trunk → 31
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Today TB updated to 31.1 and all mailing lists stopped working.
I usually have them descriptive, with two or more words.
Example of list no longer working, which worked yesterday on 31.0
Prehrana komercijala PPP <"Prehrana komercijala PPP">
(This is copy/paste from compose window)
Is this same issue or I need to file new bug?
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
See recent comments in Bug 451118. This is a very painful bug. How can we increase its urgency?
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Workaround that works is to replace the blanks " " between the words in multiword descriptors with an underscore "_".
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Confirmed workarounds:
* While composing an email open the address book and select the list you are trying to send to, highlight all the names in the list and drag them to the To: box. This uses your existing data without modifying it.
* Replacing the blanks " " between the words in such lists' descriptions with an underscore "_". This requires modifying your mailing list(s) description(s).
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
Several support requests for this are coming in via Thunderbird SUMO. I've bookmarked a few here:
https://l1bre.ca/l/?searchtags=1060901
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8481911 [details] [diff] [review]
proposed fix
Review of attachment 8481911 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: mailnews/compose/src/nsMsgCompose.cpp
@@ +4640,3 @@
> return mailList.mDescription.IsEmpty() ?
> mailList.mName.Equals(recipient.mEmail, nsCaseInsensitiveStringComparator()) :
> + (mailList.mDescription.Equals(recipient.mEmail, nsCaseInsensitiveStringComparator()) ||
Nit: trailing whitespace
Attachment #8481911 -
Flags: review?(Pidgeot18) → review+
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
Contrary to the third comment in bug #1062606, this problem is NOT limited to putting a mailing list in the BCC: line. See the attachment in bug #1062606, which clearly shows the error with a mailing list in the To: line.
Comment 16•10 years ago
|
||
Why must I remove the blanks in mailing list names when blanks are okay in the names of individual addresses?
Comment 17•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David E. Ross from comment #16)
> Why must I remove the blanks in mailing list names when blanks are okay in
> the names of individual addresses?
You don't HAVE TO do that--only if you want the current version to work. This bug is the path to create a fix that will be in a future version--there is no way they can suddenly make the current version already installed on you computer to suddenly start working. The 'workaround to substitute the underscore for spaces was trying to HELP you if you wanted to make it work without having to uninstall current and reinstall an earlier version.
Comment 18•10 years ago
|
||
the problem is the List name is handled differently
I had one user with this error on upgrade to 31.0
All users now have it at 31.1
List Name: must not contain spaces NOW
List Nickname: no effect
Description: no effect
so users must now edit all Address List Names to not contain spaces
if you remove the spaces, then the address list works as desired
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8481911 -
Flags: approval-comm-esr31?
Comment 20•10 years ago
|
||
Please also note that, in Thunderbird 31.1.0, the PopMailListRecipients extension no longer decomposes a mail list into its individual addresses. This extension would be a good work-around for this problem if only the extension were not also broken by the changes between Thunderbird 31.0 and 31.1.0.
In repairing Thunderbird for this bug, please ensure that PopMailListRecipients again works. Perhaps, that extension should be incorporated directly into Thunderbird as indicated in bug @119977.
Comment 21•10 years ago
|
||
I am experiencing the same issues with the mailing lists in TB 31.1. The lists will function when spaces in the name are replaced by underscores as Fabian said above. I also support David's comments requesting that the resolution also reinstate decomposition of the mailing list into individual addresses once again.
Comment 26•10 years ago
|
||
Will a post be made here when a stable channel release is made (not development or beta) that fixes this bug?
I am running an older version to avoid it, but want to upgrade when a version comes out that fixes it.
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
status-thunderbird32:
--- → unaffected
status-thunderbird33:
--- → unaffected
status-thunderbird34:
--- → unaffected
status-thunderbird35:
--- → unaffected
status-thunderbird_esr31:
--- → affected
tracking-thunderbird_esr31:
--- → ?
Comment 30•10 years ago
|
||
So far I've answered / seen 17 support requests related to this:
https://l1bre.ca/l/?searchtags=1060901
Comment 31•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8481911 [details] [diff] [review]
proposed fix
[Triage Comment]
Please get this landed in trunk and across aurora/beta asap.
Attachment #8481911 -
Flags: approval-comm-beta+
Attachment #8481911 -
Flags: approval-comm-aurora+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 32•10 years ago
|
||
It should not go into aurora/beta, as it's a problem ONLY on 31.1.
Comment 40•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8481911 [details] [diff] [review]
proposed fix
Sorry, got that wrong about where this needed to land.
Attachment #8481911 -
Flags: approval-comm-esr31?
Attachment #8481911 -
Flags: approval-comm-esr31+
Attachment #8481911 -
Flags: approval-comm-beta+
Attachment #8481911 -
Flags: approval-comm-aurora+
Comment 41•10 years ago
|
||
Fix landed:
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-esr31/rev/aca1ac1d498e
We hope to be releasing this either today or tomorrow.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 42•10 years ago
|
||
> We hope to be releasing this either today or tomorrow.
Does this mean the stable Thunderbird download to the public will contain it, i.e. be a 31.1.1 version (for example)?
Comment 45•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Banner (:standard8) from comment #41)
> Fix landed:
>
> https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-esr31/rev/aca1ac1d498e
>
> We hope to be releasing this either today or tomorrow.
will an email notice be sent if we supply an email address? This bug is driving me buggy. :)
Flags: needinfo?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Comment 47•10 years ago
|
||
Would it be possible to get a Thunderbird 31.2 with this fixed so that we do not have to wait for Thunderbird 32?
Assignee | ||
Comment 48•10 years ago
|
||
A tb31.1.1 release is on its way, probably within days. Candidate builds are already here:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/candidates/31.1.1-candidates/build1/
Flags: needinfo?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Comment 49•10 years ago
|
||
Is there a test going along with the bug fix? While searching for the cause of this error I ran across references to the bug in the past and previous fixes. It would be nice if going forward it did not get past the testing stage.
Assignee | ||
Comment 50•10 years ago
|
||
Yes, there is a test in place.
Assignee | ||
Comment 51•10 years ago
|
||
Thunderbird 31.1.1 containing the fix has now been released.
Comment 52•10 years ago
|
||
Downloaded. Tested. Looks good!
Thanks!
--Fred Stluka
Comment 53•10 years ago
|
||
31.1.1 works fine thanks works as expected from previous editions thanks
Comment 54•10 years ago
|
||
Thunderbird 31.1.1 appears to have fixed the problem. Thanks to all who participated in getting this fixed.
Comment 55•10 years ago
|
||
To those who fixed this and to whoever made the decision to release it in Thunderbird 31.1.1: Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Even the PopMailListRecipients extension works.
Comment 56•10 years ago
|
||
The quick fix is much appreciated. I echo my thanks.
Comment 57•10 years ago
|
||
Thanks so much for fixing this annoying bug :-)
Comment 58•10 years ago
|
||
And I'll also echo everyone's thanks; I especially appreciate the speed with which all you software people developed, tested, and got the fix out the door. Thank you!
Comment 59•10 years ago
|
||
Late to offer my thanks as I've been helping my daughter move house, but I really appreciate the speedy fix of what is for me an essential feature. Thank you!
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 31.0
Comment 63•9 years ago
|
||
This issue was fixed in version 31.1.1
I am not experiencing a problem.
However, I would like to report that I'm seeing a report in support forum that version 38.2.0 is showing same issue.
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1083411?utm_campaign=questions-reply&utm_medium=email&utm_source=notification
Also there was a report by Andrew S. McCullough in this bug 542947 stating same issue in version 38.2.0
Could this be looked at before we start to get loads of reports.
Should a new bug be created?
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•