Closed
Bug 593585
Opened 14 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Use pymake by default on Windows
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: khuey, Assigned: coop)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [pymake][buildfaster:p1][sheriff-want])
Attachments
(7 files, 7 obsolete files)
1.41 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
5.76 KB,
application/x-gzip
|
Details | |
2.34 KB,
patch
|
khuey
:
review+
rain1
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
32.28 KB,
patch
|
catlee
:
review+
coop
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.11 KB,
patch
|
catlee
:
review+
coop
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.51 KB,
patch
|
catlee
:
review+
bhearsum
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.15 KB,
patch
|
catlee
:
review+
jlund
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•14 years ago
|
||
Configure relatively so that pymake will work.
Attachment #472154 -
Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•14 years ago
|
||
Attachment #472155 -
Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Attachment #472156 -
Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
The relative configure works around the problems of switching between pymake and gmake that stalled the previous attempt in Bug 485411 for all of the targets normally used. We should verify that update generation and such works too before making this live. I verified it in a VM that releng loaned me but buildbot doesn't generally like me :-)
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 472156 [details] [diff] [review]
I'm in two minds about this. It would be useful to maintain slave specific settings for make (4-core hardware >>> 1-core VM). But we also need to deal with pymake being merged to other repos at different times (a global change to catlee, any ideas ?
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Created attachment 472156 [details] [diff] [review] [details]
>
> I'm in two minds about this. It would be useful to maintain slave specific
> settings for make (4-core hardware >>> 1-core VM). But we also need to deal
> with pymake being merged to other repos at different times (a global change to
> catlee, any ideas ?
Well, we're currently at -j4 for VMs and -j1 for ix slaves. We could instead make the change in choose-make-flags. Personally, I'd rather just stop including it if it's going to give identical behaviour for all slaves.
Also, mozconfigs for windows are already broken up by branch, so we can land this on mozilla-central without affecting other branches.
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 472154 [details] [diff] [review]
Configure relatively
I'm really not psyched for this being a shell script. I realize you have to run it from client.mk, which doesn't have the benefit of having configure, but this is still pretty awful.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
If we can take a dependency on python 2.6 we can ditch the shell script.
(In reply to comment #8)
> If we can take a dependency on python 2.6 we can ditch the shell script.
Didn't we make that decision (to require 2.6) already?
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
No. We recently bumped to 2.5 for some test changes related to the no remote XUL stuff. We've shipped python 2.6 in mozillabuild for sometime, but it has not been required.
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> Well, we're currently at -j4 for VMs and -j1 for ix slaves. We could instead
> make the change in choose-make-flags. Personally, I'd rather just stop
> including it if it's going to give identical behaviour for all slaves.
It's possible we might be able to go higher than -j4 on the ix slaves and really work those boxes hard with pymake. eg, the standard rule would say -j6 on a four core box. Then we still desire a slave-specific config.
Presumably -j4 on VMs is an attempt to give the CPU a moderate amount of work in the face of slow I/O, although that seems a little bonkers for places like layout and content.
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #472154 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #472154 -
Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek)
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #472155 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #472155 -
Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek)
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
This may or may not break PGO. I ran a PGO build locally last night and it appeared to complete much faster than normal, but the resulting binaries didn't depend on any of the pgo instrumentation code. I pushed this to try to verify that PGO works.
Attachment #481802 -
Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek)
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 481802 [details] [diff] [review]
Better Patch
This doesn't work if the objdir doesn't already exist.
Attachment #481802 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #481802 -
Flags: review?(ted.mielczarek)
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [pymake]
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #472156 -
Flags: review?(nrthomas)
Comment 14•14 years ago
|
||
FWIW, simply defining the MAKE variable to be "$(PYTHON) $(TOPSRCDIR)/build/pymake/make.py", with no other change, worked for me.
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•14 years ago
|
||
Locally or on tinderbox? Things like "make package", etc, just work with that?
Comment 16•14 years ago
|
||
Locally. "make package" is not called through client.mk on tinderbox, so either way won't work.
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•14 years ago
|
||
Right ... the build automation does things differently, and the point of this approach was not to have to worry about that.
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•14 years ago
|
||
To be clear, the patch here does a relative configure, so it *does* work on Tinderbox.
It still needed some sorting out with PGO though.
Comment 19•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #18)
> To be clear, the patch here does a relative configure, so it *does* work on
> Tinderbox.
Not sure what need to be fixed, there, really.
(In reply to comment #17)
> Right ... the build automation does things differently, and the point of
> this approach was not to have to worry about that.
Except you don't make -f client.mk package, you make -C objdir package, which with your patch or not, will do the same thing: use gmake.
Reporter | ||
Comment 20•14 years ago
|
||
Yes, and with a relative configure gmake and pymake can use the same objdir interchangeably. If you do an absolute configure with pymake gmake will choke since Windows paths get baked into everything.
Comment 21•13 years ago
|
||
Let's try and do this in the build automation
Assignee: khuey → nobody
Component: Build Config → Release Engineering
Product: Core → mozilla.org
QA Contact: build-config → release
Whiteboard: [pymake] → [pymake][buildfaster:p1]
Version: unspecified → other
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → catlee
Comment 22•13 years ago
|
||
pymake is failing in make package-tests with:
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32\build\obj-firefox\testing\mochitest\Makefile:203:0$ e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32/build/obj-firefox/config/nsinstall.exe -D ../../dist/test-package-stage/mochitest/content/
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32\build\obj-firefox\testing\mochitest\Makefile:204:0$ cp -RL ../../_tests/testing/mochitest/browser ../../dist/test-package-stage/mochitest/content/
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32\build\obj-firefox\testing\mochitest\Makefile:205:0$ cp -RL ../../_tests/testing/mochitest/chrome ../../dist/test-package-stage/mochitest/content/
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32\build\obj-firefox\testing\mochitest\Makefile:207:0$ cp -RL ../../_tests/testing/mochitest/a11y ../../dist/test-package-stage/mochitest/content/
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32\build\obj-firefox\testing\mochitest\Makefile:210:0: command '(rm -rf ../../dist/test-package-stage/mochitest/content/)' failed, return code -127
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32\build\testing\testsuite-targets.mk:280:0: command 'd:/mozilla-build/python25/python.exe e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32/build/build/pymake/pymake/../make.py -C ./testing/mochitest stage-package' failed, return code 2
[Error 2] The system cannot find the file specified
Reporter | ||
Comment 23•13 years ago
|
||
With the patches in Bug 685655 and Bug 685666 make package-tests completes successfully here with pymake.
Comment 24•13 years ago
|
||
Attachment #564946 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Comment 25•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 564946 [details] [diff] [review]
Add ability to use pymake to buildbotcustom
r+, assuming this doesn't break leak tests or other post-build steps.
Attachment #564946 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Comment 26•13 years ago
|
||
gozer/john,
Will this patch as it stands make using pymake impossible on your new try setup? (as in, do you use generateBranchObjects)?
Comment 27•13 years ago
|
||
I've been running pymake for my local central-builds and came accross a problem with relative paths while running a check. I think pymake still requires relative paths on win due to mixing it with make for some submakes. Check fails with a "ImportError: No module named manifestparser" root error because it can't find that Python module from the build directory. Error comes from build/Makefile.in line 124 that uses a relative srcdir to set include path, which ends up not matching due to pythonpath.py using execfile() to run the end script and that seems to change the cwd.
Comment 28•13 years ago
|
||
waiting for dep bugs to be fixed
Assignee: catlee → nobody
Priority: -- → P5
Reporter | ||
Comment 29•13 years ago
|
||
Now that Bug 685665 has been fixed on mozilla-central, catlee is going to test another build with pymake and see if he runs into any more problems.
Comment 30•13 years ago
|
||
almost there...we're now failing on both 'make.py l10n-check' and 'make.py l10n-check MOZ_PKG_PRETTYNAMES=1'
Comment 31•13 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 32•13 years ago
|
||
I poked at the l10n-check failure today. It's in some hairy stuff, will take a bit to figure out.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Hardware: x86 → All
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → joey
Severity: enhancement → normal
Priority: P5 → P4
Updated•13 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [pymake][buildfaster:p1] → [pymake][buildfaster:p1][sheriff-want]
Comment 33•13 years ago
|
||
Status update: I've been working with a loaner build machine over the past few days. Here's what's left to do:
1. Fix bug 741014, bug 767833, bug 779922, bug 780222, and bug 780241. All five bugs have patches up for review.
2. Land glandium's changes in bug 774032.
3. Work with releng and find a way to run pymake on builds but not on l10n repacks. This would make bug 602908 moot (see bug 602908 comment 11).
And that should be about it, though of course new issues could crop up.
Comment 34•13 years ago
|
||
Note that my preceding comment only applies to WIn32 opt builds, so hopefully we can enable pymake just for them as a first step. PGO has its own issues, which I'm working through right now.
Comment 35•13 years ago
|
||
Win32 PGO works now, modulo one bug (bug 780407, fix inbound). I'm getting a ~50 minute speedup on clobber PGO builds compared to trunk, with a majority of time taken in relinking xul.dll so it can't be helped.
(I'm testing without glandium's changes in bug 774032, because they break Pymake per bug 780421.)
Comment 36•13 years ago
|
||
There's two patches left (bug 741014 and bug 767833), both awaiting reviews from khuey.
Comment 37•12 years ago
|
||
I just checked in the last couple of fixes to inbound. Once they land on mozilla-central, it's off to releng to switch on Pymake. We'll want to make one more change to m-c once that is done: add mk_add_options MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS="-j4" to both the Win32 mozconfigs but not the Win64 mozconfig. Well, either that or pass in -j4 over the command line for the compile steps.
In the beginning, we'll want to switch to Pymake for Win opt, Win debug and Win pgo builds -- but just the builds. l10n repacks should stay on GNU make for now.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: joey → coop
Priority: P4 → P2
Assignee | ||
Comment 38•12 years ago
|
||
Nightly PGO win32 builds are currently failing in my staging env. Log is here:
http://people.mozilla.org/~coop/pymake_w32_nightly_stdio.html
Snippet:
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32-ntly\build\config\rules.mk:762:0$ link -NOLOGO -OUT:mkdepend.exe -PDB:mkdepend.pdb host_cppsetup.obj host_ifparser.obj host_include.obj host_main.obj host_parse.obj host_pr.obj -MACHINE:X86
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32-ntly\build\config\rules.mk:762:0: command 'link -NOLOGO -OUT:mkdepend.exe -PDB:mkdepend.pdb host_cppsetup.obj host_ifparser.obj host_include.obj host_main.obj host_parse.obj host_pr.obj -MACHINE:X86 ' failed, return code 1112
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32-ntly\build\config\makefiles\target_export.mk:31:0: command 'C:/mozilla-build/buildbotve/scripts/python.exe e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/build/pymake/pymake/../make.py -C mkdepend export' failed, return code 2
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32-ntly\build\config\makefiles\target_export.mk:18:0: command 'C:/mozilla-build/buildbotve/scripts/python.exe e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/build/pymake/pymake/../make.py -C config export' failed, return code 2
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32-ntly\build\config\rules.mk:603:0: command 'C:/mozilla-build/buildbotve/scripts/python.exe e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/build/pymake/pymake/../make.py export_tier_base' failed, return code 2
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32-ntly\build\config\rules.mk:569:0: command 'C:/mozilla-build/buildbotve/scripts/python.exe e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/build/pymake/pymake/../make.py tier_base' failed, return code 2
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32-ntly\build\client.mk:348:0: command 'C:/mozilla-build/buildbotve/scripts/python.exe e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/build/pymake/pymake/../make.py -j1 -C obj-firefox' failed, return code 2
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32-ntly\build\client.mk:193:0: command 'C:/mozilla-build/buildbotve/scripts/python.exe e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/build/pymake/pymake/../make.py -f e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/client.mk realbuild MOZ_PROFILE_GENERATE=1 MOZ_PGO_INSTRUMENTED=1' failed, return code 2
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32-ntly\build\client.mk:149:0: command 'C:/mozilla-build/buildbotve/scripts/python.exe e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/build/pymake/pymake/../make.py -f e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/client.mk profiledbuild' failed, return code 2
program finished with exit code 2
Comment 39•12 years ago
|
||
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32-ntly\build\config\rules.mk:963:0$ cl InvokeClWithDependencyGeneration cl -Fohost_pr.obj -c -TC -nologo -Fdhost_pr.pdb -DXP_WIN32 -DXP_WIN -DWIN32 -D_WIN32 -DNO_X11 -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS -Ox -MT -DINCLUDEDIR=\"/usr/include\" -DOBJSUFFIX=\".obj\" -Ie:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/config/mkdepend -I. -I../../dist/include -Ie:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/obj-firefox/dist/include/nspr -Ie:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/obj-firefox/dist/include/nss -Ie:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/obj-firefox/dist/include/nspr e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32-ntly/build/config/mkhost_cppsetup.obj : fatal error LNK1112: module machine type 'x64' conflicts with target machine type 'X86'
Looks like bad arguments to the linker.
Also, -DINCLUDEDIR=\"/usr/include\" isn't a proper path. Although, that will likely be ignored.
Comment 40•12 years ago
|
||
That shouldn't even be getting built.
Comment 41•12 years ago
|
||
Seems like it was an edge case of a corner case in our build system. Bug 782759 removes the --disable-auto-deps flags from Windows nightly builds, and should fix the issue. Bug 740854 (no longer blocking this bug) purges mkdepend and friends entirely.
Assignee | ||
Comment 42•12 years ago
|
||
Dep build is hitting another error. Log is here:
http://people.mozilla.org/~coop/pymake_w32_dep_stdio.html
Snippet:
e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32\build\client.mk:149:0: command 'C:/mozilla-build/buildbotve/scripts/python.exe e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32/build/build/pymake/pymake/../make.py -f e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32/build/client.mk realbuild' failed, return code 2
crashinject.cpp
C:\Tools\sdks\v7.0\include\winnt.h(135) : fatal error C1189: #error : "No Target Architecture"
2
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "e:\builds\moz2_slave\m-cen-w32\build\build\pymake\pymake\process.py", line 224, in run
rv = m.__dict__[self.method](self.argv)
File "e:/builds/moz2_slave/m-cen-w32/build/build\cl.py", line 45, in InvokeClWithDependencyGeneration
sys.exit(ret)
SystemExit: 2
None
program finished with exit code 2
Comment 43•12 years ago
|
||
Yeah, that bug is bug 782847. The environment variables set in the mozconfig aren't being passed down properly.
Comment 44•12 years ago
|
||
With the patches in bug 782759, bug 782847 and bug 782866, I was able to do a full build run on Windows using the start-msvc9-x64.bat script.
Comment 45•12 years ago
|
||
Since we're probably going to be deploying pymake step by step, we'd need to support both -j4 for pymake and -j1 for GNU make.
Attachment #655008 -
Flags: review?(khuey)
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #655008 -
Flags: review?(khuey) → review+
Comment 46•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 655008 [details] [diff] [review]
Go fast if using pymake
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/8dc1dad174fd
Attachment #655008 -
Flags: checked-in+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [pymake][buildfaster:p1][sheriff-want] → [leave open][pymake][buildfaster:p1][sheriff-want]
Comment 47•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 48•12 years ago
|
||
This essentially unbitrots catlee's old patch.
Tested on dev-staging with win32/64 nightlies, deps, and repacks.
Attachment #564946 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #656132 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Assignee | ||
Comment 49•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #656133 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #656133 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #656132 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 50•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 656132 [details] [diff] [review]
Set makeCmd to pymake if enable_pymake is set
https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbotcustom/rev/0a174ceb4df8
Attachment #656132 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 51•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 656133 [details] [diff] [review]
Set enable_pymake for windows platforms, turn it off for beta, release, and ESR
https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/db00706081f8
Attachment #656133 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 52•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 656132 [details] [diff] [review]
Set makeCmd to pymake if enable_pymake is set
This got backed out because of a new failure. Not sure if it's buildbot related or build system yet. The first hunk of this patch needs to use forward slashes, too. We had landed a bustage fix for it but it was backed out.
Attachment #656132 -
Flags: checked-in+ → checked-in-
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #656133 -
Flags: checked-in+ → checked-in-
Comment 53•12 years ago
|
||
The failure was fixed by backing out bug 784262.
Assignee | ||
Comment 54•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 656132 [details] [diff] [review]
Set makeCmd to pymake if enable_pymake is set
Re-landed with slashes fixed:
https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbotcustom/rev/cae1e695a890
Attachment #656132 -
Flags: checked-in- → checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 55•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 656133 [details] [diff] [review]
Set enable_pymake for windows platforms, turn it off for beta, release, and ESR
Re-landed:
https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/a0a265e04561
:sid0 is right: we can just pref this off in the configs next time (enable_pymake: False) if we need to iterate (or limit to a project branch, say).
Attachment #656133 -
Flags: checked-in- → checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 56•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #656527 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Assignee | ||
Comment 57•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 656133 [details] [diff] [review]
Set enable_pymake for windows platforms, turn it off for beta, release, and ESR
Backed out again.
Attachment #656133 -
Flags: checked-in+ → checked-in-
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #656527 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 58•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 656527 [details] [diff] [review]
Only enable pymake on the build-system branch (for now)
https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/219aadf2983b
Attachment #656527 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 59•12 years ago
|
||
So after bug bug 786791 and bug 786866 are fixed, the package steps finally work. Woo hoo!
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/php/getParsedLog.php?id=14824570&tree=Build-System&full=1 indicates that the check step is still using GNU Make. We need to switch that to Pymake.
Comment 61•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 656735 [details] [diff] [review]
Make the check step use Pymake
Review of attachment 656735 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: steps/unittest.py
@@ +399,5 @@
> self.description = [test_name + " test"]
> self.descriptionDone = [self.description[0] + " complete"]
> self.super_class = ShellCommandReportTimeout
> ShellCommandReportTimeout.__init__(self, **kwargs)
> self.addFactoryArguments(test_name=test_name)
you need to pass makeCmd=makeCmd to addFactoryArguments. r+ otherwise
Attachment #656735 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 62•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 656735 [details] [diff] [review]
Make the check step use Pymake
https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbotcustom/rev/52770a4b1764
Attachment #656735 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 63•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 656735 [details] [diff] [review]
Make the check step use Pymake
This patch made it to production.
Comment 64•12 years ago
|
||
The build-system repository is now green for Win32 opt and debug.
Assignee | ||
Comment 65•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #656133 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #656527 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #657055 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 66•12 years ago
|
||
Also leaves pymake enabled for win64 on build-system so :sid0 can continue to work on it there.
Attachment #657067 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #657067 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review+
Comment 67•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 657067 [details] [diff] [review]
Re-enable pymake for win32 everywhere except aurora, beta, release, and ESR
Landed + merged to production. Will be enabled shortly.
Attachment #657067 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 68•12 years ago
|
||
Made it to production today, again.
Comment 69•12 years ago
|
||
There are still a few issues which we can tackle in followups, but this looks fixed to me!
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [leave open][pymake][buildfaster:p1][sheriff-want] → [pymake][buildfaster:p1][sheriff-want]
Comment 70•12 years ago
|
||
Here's a patch to make Try work for Gecko 15-17 -- https://gist.github.com/3582912
If you'd like to build Gecko 15-17 on try, simply add this patch to the queue that you push.
Comment 71•12 years ago
|
||
But, on the otherhand, things you are landing to try should be targeted to Firefox 18. Anything landing on a version prior to that should be based on Mozilla-central working on Firefox 18 and not based on a try build on an earlier version in any case.
Comment 72•12 years ago
|
||
I'm sure people would like to use the try server to test out patches they backport.
Comment 73•12 years ago
|
||
Perhaps, but one would think such things should be tested against Mozilla-central first and then uplifted based on not dependent on anything else on Aurora already and being low risk. those are the rules, so I really do not see why this is required at all.
Comment 74•12 years ago
|
||
Besides. I think it is great that we finally have pymake working for mozilla-central builds. I see no good reason to try to get it working on beta or Aurora at this point.
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Comment 75•11 years ago
|
||
I think it's safe to rip this loop out now. Catlee what do you think. Will anything still touch this? /me printing config.py asserts that to be the case
Granted we will be moving off pymake with https://bugzil.la/927671
Attachment #8397270 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Comment 76•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8397270 [details] [diff] [review]
593585_remove_enable_pymake-140326.patch
Review of attachment 8397270 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
yeah, I think it's safe. you can verify with dump masters, or add an assert False inside that loop to make sure it's not being hit.
Attachment #8397270 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review+
Comment 77•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8397270 [details] [diff] [review]
593585_remove_enable_pymake-140326.patch
pushed to default: https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/34bbfa7b4a5e
dump master yielded a 0 diff
Attachment #8397270 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 78•11 years ago
|
||
in production.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•