Waking up from sleep / switching to tablet mode shows a sticky address bar panel, when Firefox is the default browser
Categories
(Core :: Widget: Win32, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: joviedo, Assigned: agashlin)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: regression, regressionwindow-wanted, Whiteboard: [see comment 42 and comment 53])
Attachments
(4 files, 1 obsolete file)
141.00 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details | |
89.16 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details | |
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
lizzard
:
approval-mozilla-beta-
|
Details | Review |
4.82 KB,
patch
|
lizzard
:
approval-mozilla-release+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 14•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 15•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 16•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 17•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 18•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 19•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 20•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 21•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 22•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 23•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 24•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 25•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 26•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 28•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 29•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 30•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 31•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 32•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 33•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 34•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 35•6 years ago
|
||
One more comment. Not only address bar gets re-displayed, but also the password prompt, web-page properties. But not the burger menu. What whoever takes this one on might want to look what is the difference.
I am attaching a screenshot of those two being displayed (removed the address bar by typing)
Comment 36•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 37•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jaagup Irve from comment #35)
One more comment. Not only address bar gets re-displayed, but also the password prompt, web-page properties. But not the burger menu. What whoever takes this one on might want to look what is the difference.
For me the burger menu gets stuck from time to time as well. So, I don't think looking into the difference there will be of much help.
Comment 40•6 years ago
|
||
hey i have the same bug. on windows 10, 64.0.2 (64-bit).
Comment 41•6 years ago
|
||
FYI, the bug does not appear in Tor (Firefox 60.4esr).
Comment 42•6 years ago
|
||
important |
(In reply to Neil Deakin from comment #29)
From the description above, it sounds like Windows is doing something with
the native windows that causes the popup to reshow. If we could reproduce
better, a first step would be to determine whether ShowWindow is being
called, or we are receiving a message that the popup is being reshown, to
narrow down whether we are doing something wrong here.
Neil, I found a way to reproduce this easily, it basically requires the firefox build to be set as the default browser in Windows 10. If the build is not set as the default browser it doesn't reproduce. This allows also to use a debug build.
I suspect Windows sends some additional notification for the default browser window, maybe for some Edge behavior. So far I saw a WM_SETFOCUS message and I see the focus manager doing some looking for descendant elements just before the popup is shown again. Unfortunately I don't know this code well enough to look for suspicious flags.
Basically the updated STR are:
- Set the build as the default browser
- launch firefox
- type something in the address bar, so the popup is shown at least once
- dismiss the popup (esc or click elsewhere)
- from the Windows 10 notification pane switch on and off tablet mode
- The address bar popup is shown and it's sticky until you type again in the address bar
Comment hidden (me-too) |
Comment hidden (me-too) |
Comment 52•6 years ago
|
||
I suggest to raise the importance of this bug. I guess, there will be more and more people having this problem now that Microsoft decided to automatically update Windows 10 to 1809. I fear that people will become annoyed and abandon Firefox.
Comment 53•6 years ago
|
||
important |
It looks like an extra WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING and WM_SHOWWINDOW message followed by some activation messages are being sent to the popup window in this case. Here is a log of the messages received after switching out of tablet mode:
HWND [wParam lParam] message
- 000A0AD8 [0 b7e0a8] WM_SETTINGSCHANGE
- 00130A2E [0 b7e0a8] WM_SETTINGSCHANGE
- 000A0AF4 [0 b7e0a8] WM_SETTINGSCHANGE
- 000A0AD8 [0 efee9c] WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING (WINDOWPOS.flags is 13)
- 00130A2E [0 efee9c] WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING (WINDOWPOS.flags is 8020)
- 00130A2E [1 efee74] WM_NCCALCSIZE
- 00130A2E [1 0] WM_NCPAINT
- 00130A2E [9301119f 0] WM_ERASEBKGND
- 00130A2E [0 efee9c] WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED
- 000A0AD8 [0 efee9c] WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING (WINDOWPOS.flags is 4014)
- 000A0AD8 [1 0] WM_SHOWWINDOW
- 000A0AD8 [0 efee9c] WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING
- 00130A2E [0 efee9c] WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING
- 00130A2E [0 a0ad8] WM_NCACTIVATE
- 00130A2E [0 a0ad8] WM_ACTIVATE
...
In a working build, line 10 and on do not occur, and other painting and mouse related messages are sent as normal.
I'm not sure what specifically triggers the difference, but it has something to do with being the default browser. Running with '-setDefaultBrowser' is enough to trigger the issue on a build that doesn't have this issue, but resetting the default browser afterwards does not make the issue go away again. Moving the build to a different directory does make the issue disappear again.
Comment 54•6 years ago
|
||
Note that in the log in the previous comment, '000A0AD8' is the autocomplete dropdown window and '00130A2E' is the browser window.
Comment 55•6 years ago
|
||
firefox is not the default browser on my computer and i have this issue
Comment hidden (obsolete) |
Comment 57•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to marco smith from comment #55)
firefox is not the default browser on my computer and i have this issue
There can be a relation regardless, setting Firefox as the default browser makes it much easier to reproduce, once this bug is fixed you can tell us if the problem still exists in your case and can be evaluated apart. Thanks.
Comment 58•6 years ago
|
||
Neil, do you plan to take this, or can you suggest someone with knowledge of the code handling these Windows messages, that may look into it? Eventually we could also contact Microsoft to understand the scope for those additional messages (I'm happy to do that, if you think it may be a bug on their side, or their insight may be useful). wdyt?
(note: I'm just trying to ensure this has a path towards resolution, and doesn't get lost)
Comment 59•6 years ago
|
||
There are a number of possible workarounds that aren't ideal:
- Hide and destroy the popup after it is closed. That would likely cause performance issues.
- If we are sure that it only happens when the tablet mode is changed or when sleep/wake occurs, we could hide and destroy popups at that time.
- Hide and destroy the popup when the extra show message occurs. My somewhat limited testing suggests that we can't prevent showing the popup, so while this limits the times when we need to remove the popup, it might have noticeable flickering.
I don't have enough knowledge to know why the message might be being sent. Presumably it is some change made to this specific version of Windows and it would be good to find out and understand what that change was and what it was for.
Comment 63•6 years ago
|
||
I never mentioned the make and model of my Laptop with this problem. I have only had the problem in Laptop mode, although the HP Spectre x360 Convertible 13 has a tablet mode, I rarely use that mode.
Comment 67•6 years ago
|
||
fwiw I can reproduce this issue on my desktop, when switching to tablet mode. So this is probably not limited only to laptops/tablets.
I'm using Windows 10 x64 1809.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 68•6 years ago
|
||
The number of dupe is worrying. We should probably track it.
Comment 69•6 years ago
|
||
This workaround handles the switch out of tablet mode at least and doesn't have any noticeable flicking or issues that I can see. It could be used if a real fix can't be found.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 70•6 years ago
|
||
This looks like a severe enough issue to be a blocker for 66. Since Windows users are now being updated automatically to version 1809 we're getting a lot of duplicate reports of this problem. Following up with jimm.
![]() |
||
Comment 71•6 years ago
|
||
unassigned -> p2. I'm looking for a good owner.
Assignee | ||
Comment 72•6 years ago
|
||
This seems to have been fixed on Windows 10 Insider Preview somewhere between 18323 and 18343, on both my VM and laptop it reproduces on '23 but not after upgrade to '43 (with a fresh install and forcing with -SetDefaultBrowser each time). The 18342 release notes did mention some tablet mode fixes, though they don't seem to directly relate to this. I'll mention it on the Microsoft discussion list to see if gets in front of someone who knows about the fix.
It's going to be a while before 1903 actually gets out to users, so it's still worthwhile trying to work around it for 1809.
It looks like this started with the introduction of level="parent"
in bug 1264983, removing that line seems to fix it, so that's a possible lead. I'll keep looking into this.
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 73•6 years ago
|
||
I tracked down the seeming dependency on -SetDefaultBrowser
(or helper.exe in general): What's really important here just is our Software\Mozilla\Firefox\TaskBarIDs
registry key. If there's a value matching our path, then we call SetCurrentProcessExplicitAppUserModelID
from the Windows nsWindow
constructor via RegisterAppModelID
. With that line removed, the issue does not reproduce, and with SetCurrentProcessExplicitAppUserModelID
I can reproduce the behavior in a small test program. This makes a lot more sense than it being related to browser detection, it's just a window manager issue.
Still looking into a workaround.
Assignee | ||
Comment 74•6 years ago
|
||
I like Neil's patch, I changed it to block SWP_SHOWWINDOW
while handling WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING
, as is done for the invisible window. That way we wouldn't switch to shown even temporarily, and it wouldn't require an extra message. In my testing this eliminates the little bit of flicker we get with show then hide (the drop shadow at the bottom border is very briefly visible).
Try run ongoing at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=e5041bacf10135c95f269cdda8334078f9607c3f
Assignee | ||
Comment 75•6 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 77•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 78•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 79•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment 81•6 years ago
|
||
After some discussion with Adam we're going to let this bake over the weekend in Nightly. Some possible concerns to look out for in regressions / new bug reports could be external apps (such as accessibility apps) which unhide invisible windows. We could still consider uplift for this for the RC build or a 2nd RC. It was broken in 65 so probably shouldn't block 66; if we don't get this fix into 66 release then we could note it as a known issue.
This is also going to be fixed in the 1903 Windows update.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 82•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Liz Henry (:lizzard) (use needinfo) from comment #81)
It was broken in 65 so probably shouldn't block 66;
I'm not sure this is sound. The reason for making this block 66 was that "Windows users are now being updated automatically to version 1809". Whether it was broken in 65 doesn't really matter if the concern is that the bulk of users are yet to update to 1809. Do we have numbers on the update rate?
This is also going to be fixed in the 1903 Windows update.
... which may take several months to reach most end users if the 1809 release is any indication.
Comment 83•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dão Gottwald [::dao] from comment #82)
(In reply to Liz Henry (:lizzard) (use needinfo) from comment #81)
It was broken in 65 so probably shouldn't block 66;
I'm not sure this is sound. The reason for making this block 66 was that
"Windows users are now being updated automatically to version 1809". Whether
it was broken in 65 doesn't really matter if the concern is that the bulk of
users are yet to update to 1809. Do we have numbers on the update rate?
Microsoft (re)turned on auto-updates for 1809 in mid-January. Because that's around when we started getting reports of the problem, I thought it might be from users updating more quickly. But, now that I look deeper, it turns out you are completely right, the rollout is still very slow. We still are seeing the bulk of Firefox/Windows users on the 1803 update (https://sql.telemetry.mozilla.org/dashboard/windows-10-user-strata) on beta and release. Nightly users are much more likely to be on 1809, but more than half are still on 1803.
Adam, this makes me lean more heavily towards trying uplift (even for Monday's build.) We could accept the risk of regressions and aim to discover them and fix them in a dot release later in the 66 cycle.
Assignee | ||
Comment 84•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9047876 [details]
Bug 1498973: Don't show a popup that should be hidden. r?jmathies
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- Feature/Bug causing the regression: Windows 10 version 1809
- User impact if declined: Hidden popups may be redisplayed in an unusable state when switching tablet mode on then off, or sometimes when waking from sleep mode. This is mostly harmless, but the popups get in the way and the easiest workaround is to restart the browser. A Windows fix is available but is not likely to be out for some months.
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: Unknown
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: Yes
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Medium
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): Risky: All Windows commands to show Firefox popups are filtered through this mechanism. If there are any third-party apps selectively unhiding our inactive popups, or if there is some mechanism that shows popups before they are officially "opened", they won't be shown. This has had little time in the wider population (only a few days on Nightly) to catch these or unexpected issues.
Not risky: The change is limited to Windows 10 version 1809 and up, so many backwards compatibility issues are avoided.
- String changes made/needed:
Comment 85•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9047876 [details]
Bug 1498973: Don't show a popup that should be hidden. r?jmathies
Fix for release-blocking issue which we expect would affect more users in 66 than in 65. OK for uplift.
![]() |
||
Comment 86•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Updated•6 years ago
|
![]() |
||
Comment 87•6 years ago
|
||
Backed out for bustage - IsWin10Sep2018UpdateOrLater not declared:
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/rev/e5dc798ba83b99c6c8a94795a3dce55450853566
Push with bustage: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=mozilla-release&resultStatus=usercancel%2Cretry%2Ctestfailed%2Cbusted%2Cexception%2Crunnable&group_state=expanded&revision=481d211be2ffad0d806292ebce8d3e242a8ca34d
Failure log: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=233181922&repo=mozilla-release
19:39:15 INFO - mozmake.EXE[5]: Entering directory 'z:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/widget/windows'
19:39:15 INFO - z:/build/build/src/clang/bin/clang.exe --driver-mode=cl -m32 -FoUnified_cpp_widget_windows2.i_o -c -Iz:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/stl_wrappers -DNDEBUG=1 -DTRIMMED=1 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -D_WIN32 -DWIN32 -D_CRT_RAND_S -DCERT_CHAIN_PARA_HAS_EXTRA_FIELDS -DOS_WIN=1 -D_UNICODE -DCHROMIUM_BUILD -DU_STATIC_IMPLEMENTATION -DUNICODE -D_WINDOWS -D_SECURE_ATL -DCOMPILER_MSVC -DMOZ_UNICODE -DSTATIC_EXPORTABLE_JS_API -DMOZ_HAS_MOZGLUE -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DIMPL_LIBXUL -Iz:/build/build/src/widget/windows -Iz:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/widget/windows -Iz:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/ipc/ipdl/_ipdlheaders -Iz:/build/build/src/ipc/chromium/src -Iz:/build/build/src/ipc/glue -Iz:/build/build/src/layout/forms -Iz:/build/build/src/layout/generic -Iz:/build/build/src/layout/xul -Iz:/build/build/src/toolkit/xre -Iz:/build/build/src/widget -Iz:/build/build/src/widget/headless -Iz:/build/build/src/xpcom/base -Iz:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include -Iz:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include/nspr -Iz:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include/nss -MD -FI z:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/mozilla-config.h -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -Qunused-arguments -guard:cf -Qunused-arguments -fcrash-diagnostics-dir=z:/build/public/build -TP -nologo -w15038 -wd5026 -wd5027 -Zc:sizedDealloc- -wd4091 -wd4577 -D_HAS_EXCEPTIONS=0 -guard:cf -W3 -Gy -Zc:inline -arch:SSE2 -Gw -wd4251 -wd4244 -wd4267 -wd4800 -wd4595 -wd4065 -Wno-inline-new-delete -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wno-microsoft-enum-value -Wno-microsoft-include -Wno-unknown-pragmas -Wno-ignored-pragmas -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-invalid-noreturn -Wno-inconsistent-missing-override -Wno-implicit-exception-spec-mismatch -Wno-unused-local-typedef -Wno-ignored-attributes -Wno-used-but-marked-unused -we4553 -D_SILENCE_TR1_NAMESPACE_DEPRECATION_WARNING -GR- -Zi -Xclang -load -Xclang z:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/build/clang-plugin/clang-plugin.dll -Xclang -add-plugin -Xclang moz-check -O2 -Oy- -Iz:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include/cairo -fprofile-instr-generate -Xclang -finstrument-functions-after-inlining -Xclang -MP -Xclang -dependency-file -Xclang .deps/Unified_cpp_widget_windows2.i_o.pp -Xclang -MT -Xclang Unified_cpp_widget_windows2.i_o -Fdgenerated.pdb -FS z:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/widget/windows/Unified_cpp_widget_windows2.cpp
19:39:15 INFO - In file included from z:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/widget/windows/Unified_cpp_widget_windows2.cpp:110:
19:39:15 INFO - z:/build/build/src/widget/windows/nsWindow.cpp(4932,7): warning: expression result unused; should this cast be to 'void'? [-Wunused-value]
19:39:15 INFO - (void*)GetAccessible();
19:39:15 INFO - ^ ~
19:39:15 INFO - z:/build/build/src/widget/windows/nsWindow.cpp(6548,35): error: use of undeclared identifier 'IsWin10Sep2018UpdateOrLater'; did you mean 'IsWin10April2018UpdateOrLater'?
19:39:15 INFO - static bool sDWMUnhidesPopups = IsWin10Sep2018UpdateOrLater();
19:39:15 INFO - ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
19:39:15 INFO - IsWin10April2018UpdateOrLater
19:39:15 INFO - z:/build/build/src/obj-firefox/dist/include\mozilla/WindowsVersion.h(153,24): note: 'IsWin10April2018UpdateOrLater' declared here
19:39:15 INFO - MOZ_ALWAYS_INLINE bool IsWin10April2018UpdateOrLater() {
19:39:15 INFO - ^
19:39:15 INFO - 1 warning and 1 error generated.
19:39:15 INFO - z:/build/build/src/config/rules.mk:1106: recipe for target 'Unified_cpp_widget_windows2.i_o' failed
19:39:15 INFO - mozmake.EXE[5]: *** [Unified_cpp_widget_windows2.i_o] Error 1
Comment 88•6 years ago
|
||
This will also need the patch in bug 1528045.
![]() |
||
Comment 89•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 90•6 years ago
|
||
We will have to back this out and do an RC3.
Adam will investigate bug 1534935 and we can aim to re-land this fix in a dot release during the 66 cycle.
Comment 91•6 years ago
|
||
Pascal, if you're ok with it, I'd like to leave this in 67 for beta 2 so we can see if there are any other regressions (because it's a bad bug that we'd like to fix during 66 release). So if we could leave these patches in 67 for today, you could back them out if you like for 67.0b3. What do you think?
Comment 92•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Liz Henry (:lizzard) (use needinfo) from comment #91)
Pascal, if you're ok with it, I'd like to leave this in 67 for beta 2 so we can see if there are any other regressions (because it's a bad bug that we'd like to fix during 66 release). So if we could leave these patches in 67 for today, you could back them out if you like for 67.0b3. What do you think?
It's OK for me, if we don't get a fix tomorrow, we will back out from mozilla-central before the final merge and beta 3.
Comment 93•6 years ago
|
||
Backed out changeset 6776dac63175 (bug 1498973) for regression from bug 1534935 at Lizzard's request
Backout:
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/rev/164a57c0cdf0088e786e6b966e34fdd3799671d1
![]() |
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 95•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9047876 [details]
Bug 1498973: Don't show a popup that should be hidden. r?jmathies
Clearing release approval since this was backed out.
Comment 96•6 years ago
|
||
We will likely be preparing for a dot release next week so we could try landing this again on m-r. (Not this week, though, please .) Adam, what do you think?
Assignee | ||
Comment 97•6 years ago
|
||
I'm fine with giving it another shot. If nothing pops up on beta over the next week or so then I'll put in for the uplift. Fortunately the bug 1534935 regression was very straightforward.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 98•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Adam Gashlin [:agashlin] from comment #97)
I'm fine with giving it another shot. If nothing pops up on beta over the next week or so then I'll put in for the uplift. Fortunately the bug 1534935 regression was very straightforward.
Adam, could you prepare an uplift for release if you think is still makes sense to include it in 66.0.2? Thanks!
Assignee | ||
Comment 99•6 years ago
|
||
Sure! Should I just post a raw patch here that can land by itself, rolling up the one-line fix for bug 1534935?
Also I don't know how landing works on release, would I be able to push this myself or do I need to get a sheriff to do it?
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 100•6 years ago
•
|
||
(In reply to Adam Gashlin [:agashlin] from comment #99)
Sure! Should I just post a raw patch here that can land by itself, rolling up the one-line fix for bug 1534935?
Also I don't know how landing works on release, would I be able to push this myself or do I need to get a sheriff to do it?
Landing is done by Sheriffs. Attach a patch that applies cleanly to the mozilla-release repo and ask for an uplift (select the 'approval-mozilla-release:?' flag in the attachment page and fill in the uplift form that appears in Bugzilla which gives release managers information about the uplift that help them in their decision process, maybe this article may be more explicit as it has screenshots:
https://release.mozilla.org/tooling/bugzilla/2018/10/03/uplift-form.html
Assignee | ||
Comment 101•6 years ago
|
||
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- Feature/Bug causing the regression: Windows 10 version 1809
- User impact if declined: Hidden popups may be redisplayed in an unusable state when switching tablet mode on then off, or sometimes when waking from sleep mode. This is mostly harmless, but the popups get in the way and the easiest workaround is to restart the browser.
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: Unknown
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: Yes
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Medium
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): There are many mechanisms that show popups, and automated test coverage is not present for all of them. Some mechanisms may not be used in all builds so even manual testing might not catch them. This could result in parts of the interface being invisible.
That said, this has been on Nightly for a few weeks, and Beta for about a week, with no reported issues since bug 1534935 was fixed (and that fix was straightforward).
Alternatives: A Windows fix is available but is not likely to be distributed for some months.
- String changes made/needed:
- Do you want to request approval of these patches as well?: on
Comment 102•6 years ago
|
||
The uplift request is coming too late for 66.0.2 but if we have a 66.0.3 release, we can include the patch in this release. I'll let Liz decide when she comes back from PTO next week.
Comment 103•6 years ago
|
||
Build ID: 20190325125126
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:67.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/67.0
Verified as fixed on the latest Nightly and on the latest Beta build.
Comment 104•6 years ago
|
||
Adam, thank you for fixing this bug, it's critical for us that the Address Bar works properly, we greatly appreciate your help.
Comment 106•6 years ago
|
||
![]() |
||
Comment 108•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Comment 109•6 years ago
|
||
Adding to release notes for 66.0.3 as "FIXED: Performance issues with some HTML5 games "
Comment 110•6 years ago
|
||
Oops. Wrong bug. This is noted as "FIXED: Address bar on tablets running Windows 10 now behave correctly."
Comment 111•6 years ago
|
||
Build ID: 20190409155332
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/66.0
Verified as fixed on the latest Release build (66.0.3)
Comment 112•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Liz Henry (:lizzard) (use needinfo) from comment #110)
Oops. Wrong bug. This is noted as "FIXED: Address bar on tablets running Windows 10 now behave correctly."
Does that mean, contrary to the title, that all overlays have been fixed, e.g. menu, site information, etc.?
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 113•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to xracoonx from comment #112)
(In reply to Liz Henry (:lizzard) (use needinfo) from comment #110)
Oops. Wrong bug. This is noted as "FIXED: Address bar on tablets running Windows 10 now behave correctly."
Does that mean, contrary to the title, that all overlays have been fixed, e.g. menu, site information, etc.?
I wasn't able to reproduce the other overlay issues consistently to verify that they were fixed as well, but I strongly suspect they were. If anyone has workable steps to reproduce those, I'll be glad to check.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment hidden (offtopic) |
Comment hidden (offtopic) |
Comment 116•5 years ago
|
||
Please specify a root cause for this bug. See :tmaity for more information.
Assignee | ||
Comment 117•5 years ago
|
||
The root cause was a Windows 10 bug introduced in 1809 ("October 2018 Update") and fixed in 1903 ("May 2019 Update"). The fix here is a workaround.
Description
•