[meta] Bugs related to the aspect-ratio property from CSS Sizing 4
Categories
(Core :: Layout, enhancement, P1)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: svoisen, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 15 open bugs, Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
(Keywords: dev-doc-needed, meta, Whiteboard: [layout:backlog])
Tracking bug for potentially implementing the aspect-ratio property. The draft spec for CSS Sizing 4 adds support for aspect-ratio, which allows content authors to specify an intrinsic aspect ratio to be used when auto sizing boxes.
|
Reporter | |
Updated•7 years ago
|
|
||
Updated•6 years ago
|
|
|
Reporter | |
Updated•6 years ago
|
|
||
Comment 2•5 years ago
•
|
||
Just noticed Chromium merged the implementation of aspect-ratio for blocks: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/2151827
|
|
||
Updated•5 years ago
|
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
Now that we triage by severity, setting priority to P1 to reflect backlog prioritization on this bug as either in-progress, or planned development in the near term. See https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/Layout#Backlog_Tracking_in_Bugzilla
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
Updating to reflect the fact that Boris is actively working on this.
|
||
Updated•5 years ago
|
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
|
||
Comment 5•1 years ago
|
||
Closing as fixed, since we shipped this a while back.
|
||
Comment 6•1 year ago
|
||
Although we shipped aspect-ratio long time ago, but this is a meta bug collecting aspect-ratio issues. I feel it is still worth keeping it open until all the dependencies are fixed.
|
|
||
Updated•1 year ago
|
|
|
||
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
Fair enough; though in that case we should update the bug title. Otherwise, with the current title, this-bug-being-open implies that aspect-ratio is still-to-be implemented/shipped. (That's the potential-misperception that prompted me to close the bug.)
--> Adjusting title to make that clearer
Description
•